0
A published hypothesis is accepted by the scientific community should be tested by the scientific community does not need to be tested becomes a scientific law?
A published hypothesis is accepted by the scientific community as a proposed explanation for a phenomenon but must undergo rigorous testing and validation through experiments and observations. If consistently supported by evidence, it may contribute to the development of a scientific theory, rather than becoming a scientific law. Scientific laws describe observable phenomena under specific conditions and are generally concise statements, while theories provide broader explanations. Therefore, a hypothesis does not automatically become a scientific law; it requires substantial evidence to be widely accepted and understood.
What else can I help you with?
What happens if more than one hypothesis is put forward to explain the same observations?
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research.
Why a new scientific hypothesis might be accepted or rejected?
Observational evidence
Is a scientific hypothesis an absolutely unbreakable law of physics?
No. A hypothesis is a proposed statement in science. When a hypothesis is constantly proven and accepted by the scientific community, it becomes known as a theory. Even a theory is not a LAW of physics. The only laws that exist in science are those that can be proven through math. While unbreakable laws of physics exist, if it cannot be mathematically proven, a scientific hypothesis is not an unbreakable law of physics.
What is the proper order of the steps of the scientific method?
The proper order of the steps of the scientific method typically includes: 1) making observations, 2) formulating a hypothesis, 3) conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, 4) analyzing the data, and 5) drawing conclusions. Based on the results, the hypothesis may be accepted, rejected, or revised. Finally, the findings are often shared with the scientific community.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way way to prove that the hypothesis is wrong?
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
Is a scientific hypothesis a accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
What happens if more than one hypothesis is put forward to explain the same observations?
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it. A working hypothesis is a provisionally accepted hypothesis proposed for further research.
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that it is wrong?
It is accepted if the data support it.
Why a new scientific hypothesis might be accepted or rejected?
Observational evidence
Is a scientific hypothesis an absolutely unbreakable law of physics?
No. A hypothesis is a proposed statement in science. When a hypothesis is constantly proven and accepted by the scientific community, it becomes known as a theory. Even a theory is not a LAW of physics. The only laws that exist in science are those that can be proven through math. While unbreakable laws of physics exist, if it cannot be mathematically proven, a scientific hypothesis is not an unbreakable law of physics.
How does a scientific hypothesis become an accepted theory?
when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis
Is theory a fact?
well, a theory is a general idea about something,so i do not think so.*A theory is a hypothesis well accepted by the scientific community. So I wouldn't think it was a fact considering a hypothesis is an educated guess.
What is the proper order of the steps of the scientific method?
The proper order of the steps of the scientific method typically includes: 1) making observations, 2) formulating a hypothesis, 3) conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, 4) analyzing the data, and 5) drawing conclusions. Based on the results, the hypothesis may be accepted, rejected, or revised. Finally, the findings are often shared with the scientific community.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way way to prove that the hypothesis is wrong?
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
What is the definition of accepted value?
a quantity used by general agreement of the scientific community is accepted value.
Is a theory that has been proven and is widely accepted in the scientific community?
constant
