Scientific statements analyze properties of something rather than state opinions about it. For example, "it has a pungent smell" is a scientific statement, but "it stinks" is not.
In what way do you mean classification? Scientific names or the actual difference between their anatomy?
There is no scientific name; that's it, baby mama. Some will call themselves "the mother of his child," but there is a difference between the two.
A dichotomous key is a tool used to identify organisms based on a series of choices between pairs of statements or characteristics. It presents a systematic way to classify and identify organisms by narrowing down options until a species is identified based on its unique features, including scientific names.
The scientific name for a tadpole is usually "Larva" followed by the species name of the frog it will develop into. For example, the scientific name for a tadpole of the common frog (Rana temporaria) would be "Larva Rana temporaria."
The term "mushroom" is commonly used to refer to edible fungi, while "toadstool" typically refers to poisonous or inedible fungi. However, biologically there is no clear distinction between the two terms, and they are often used interchangeably. It's best to rely on scientific names to accurately classify fungi.
Scientific questions are based on observable evidence and can be tested through research and experimentation, leading to objective conclusions. Nonscientific questions are often subjective, speculative, or based on personal beliefs, and do not follow the systematic methods of the scientific process.
Scientific hypothesis can be understand by scientific approach (using scientific methods & formulae etc) Nonscientific hypothesis is based on assumptions only.
There is no difference. Both statements are invalid.
A method that claims to be scientific involves the use of clear procedures which not only show how the results were achieved, but also clear enough for other researchers to attempt to repeat them and must also have empirical relevance to the world. Empirical relevance involves showing that statements, explanation etc. which are used or derived from this approach can be verified of checked out. A scientific method should be objective and not biased and should not rely on hearsay on unsubstantiated facts. A nonscientific method is not systematic and do not have principles in place that should be adhered to. Tshegofatso Rampatla
difference between command and statement
Between Scientific Theory and what?
what is the difference between the common and scientific name of an organisms
differance between control statement and looping statement?
what is the difference between the common and scientific name of an organisms
Whay is the difference between remainder statement and standard statements?
difference between scientific management practices and modern management practices.?
Hypothesis