That would depend upon the subject of the debate.
The cast of Informed Debate - 2011 includes: Daryl Moon as himself
The Webster-Hayne debate, occurring in 1830, primarily revolved around the issues of states' rights versus federal authority, especially in the context of the protection of individual liberties and the expansion of the nation. Daniel Webster argued for a strong federal government to preserve the Union and prevent disunion, while Robert Hayne defended the rights of states to nullify federal laws and promote regional interests, particularly concerning westward expansion and the influence of the South. This debate highlighted the growing tensions over sectionalism and foreshadowed the conflicts that would later lead to the Civil War.
I believe that it is an argument that appears to be about what super hero can beat Superman, but in reality it is used as device to debate political issues. Issues such as Superman (USA) can be beat by...say...Aquaman(could be Iran, could be anybody). That is my understanding of it in a nut shell. I dont really get it. I understand it, but dont like this approach. I am more of a state it as it is and not beat around the bush kind of person. Anyway, I hope this helps some.
A guy who had a debate about Darwins theory
== ==
a part of life
two articulate and knowledgeable candidates debate issues.
WikiAnswers is here to answer specific questions not to debate issues.
Inherency, significance, solvency, topicality, and harms
Debate informs people as to the issues and possible solutions so that consensus as to what should be done can be built.
the mexican war
Inherency, significance, solvency, topicality, and harms
What is leisure? What is courage? Etc....
they're legislaters
A point or matter of discussion, debate, or dispute of an organization's environmental aspects.
yes