The chair indicates that someone had to reach something. And the milk indicates some sort of animal being fed. The whistle and some of the other items were also clues. Holmes put it together and was able to deduce what was going on.
Holmes is extremely interested in "all that is bizarre" or unusual. The nature of this case and its clues are definitely unique, so the interest of Holmes and Watson is peaked. ...
The reader is left to speculate, and here are the clues: 1. Stamford presumably still works at St. Bartholomew Hospital (Bart's) where he and Watson met years earlier; 2. Holmes is working in Bart's chemical laboratory; 3. Holmes and Stamford probably bumped into each other a time or two.
Find the answers to these questions and you will have your clues. 1. What two businesses were found to be in close proximity? 2. What happened when Holmes thumped his stick on the pavement? 3. What about the pawnbroker's assistant did Holmes find interesting?
Yes, he often went on crime scenes. In some cases, Scotland Yard would take him there. He would often discover clues that the police had overlooked.
The chair indicates that someone had to reach something. And the milk indicates some sort of animal being fed. The whistle and some of the other items were also clues. Holmes put it together and was able to deduce what was going on.
[object Object]
Holmes is extremely interested in "all that is bizarre" or unusual. The nature of this case and its clues are definitely unique, so the interest of Holmes and Watson is peaked. ...
Sherlock Holmes views Dr. Watson as a valued companion and trusted confidant in solving cases. Despite his occasional teasing, Holmes respects Watson's loyalty, intelligence, and dedication to their work together. Their partnership is characterized by mutual respect and a deep bond of friendship.
Deduction in writing terms, i believe. Is to logicly reason out the solution to a situation from a "list" of clues ( to deduce ) ie:- Three suspects to a crime, most of the evidence is leading to one suspect, you would "deduce" they are the perpertrator of the crime. If correct then your DEDUCTION would have been correct.
To defeat Mortimer Beckett and solve the time paradox, you need to carefully investigate each scene for hidden objects and clues. Pay attention to details and use logic to solve puzzles and unlock new areas. Utilize any inventory items wisely to progress through the game and ultimately outsmart Mortimer Beckett in the final showdown.
?
According to the fictional character 'Sherlock Holmes', ALL accents contain abundant clues as to the origin of the speaker.
In 'The Problem of Thor Bridge,' Holmes said that his own special line of work was a balance between imagination and reality. Holmes was adamant that he never guesses, but that he balances probabilities and uses scientific imagination to begin his speculations and logically piece together clues.
[object Object]
I suspect this question has something to do with Leonard Nimoy's live performances as Sherlock Holmes, but I have no further "clues" on this one. Does anyone have any further help? Please see the link below.
The reader is left to speculate, and here are the clues: 1. Stamford presumably still works at St. Bartholomew Hospital (Bart's) where he and Watson met years earlier; 2. Holmes is working in Bart's chemical laboratory; 3. Holmes and Stamford probably bumped into each other a time or two.