The individuals bound to the lord of the land and unable to lawfully leave their birthplace were known as serfs or peasant laborers in the feudal system. They were tied to the land they worked on and were subject to the lord's control, providing labor and a portion of their produce in exchange for protection and the right to work the land. This system was prevalent in medieval Europe, where serfs had limited rights and mobility.
She will leave Disney. She decided to do that so that she could get on with her singing career! Hope this helps. V.A
The episode is called "Tennessee Bound." It takes place in season 4 when the gang is off to Hollywood for Ricky's movie deal.
It's ironic that Henry finds himself on a freighter bound for London because he initially sought to escape his past and the burdens of his life, yet he ends up on a ship that symbolizes his entrapment and the cyclical nature of his journey. Instead of achieving freedom, he finds himself on a path that leads him back to the very place he was trying to leave behind, highlighting the futility of his attempts to break away from his circumstances. This twist underscores the themes of fate and the inescapability of one's own history.
I don't think he left Wizard Of Waverly Place The show is almost over anyway
Malaysia.
I dont
serfs where like slaves but they could leave serfdom is like slavery but the serfs could leave they just wouldn't have a place to live as they did being a serf to someones home
No, a serf was a good deal lower than a knight. A serf was an agricultural worker who was bound to the land he lived on and was not allowed to leave it. A serf was not a slave, because he could not be purchased or sold, but he was also not free to leave the place where he lived. The knights were the lowest level of nobility. They were at a higher status than freemen, who were at a higher status than serfs.
Under no circumstances; people have an unconditional right to express their views.
Place or objects belonging to civilians
Homeward Bound takes place in California. I'm not exactly sure where the ranch is, but I know the family moved to San Francisco.
The answer is B.
Amazon
It is very rare for one to be charged for having profane language in a public place. You could be asked to leave the public place.
If you mean leave Britain as their homeland then, because they heard America was a great new place and you could find many new jobs there.
The sentence: "Were he to leave, she could take his place" is gramatically correct. The phrase is equivalent to "If he were to leave..." and the choice to use the inversion "Were he" instead of "If he were" is a more poetic form and adds emphasis. These types of emphasis-adding phrases are common in hypothetical situations (e.g., "Had I known" instead of "If I had known"). The choice of "were he to leave" is more controversial. It is a colloquial form of English, by which I mean that it is an informal, spoken phrase that one is unlikely to encounter in a formal, written context. One is more likely to find the phrase "If he left, she could take his place" in a formal context or the even more formal "Should he leave, she could take his place." Could is the conditional form of the modal can. It is unclear from the context if the speaker means "would be able to take" meaning that his leaving would grant her the ability to replace him. I would tend to think not, rather that she has the ability to replace him already, independent of his choice to leave, and that if he left it is possible that she would replace him.
just give it a warm and nice place to live..and also leave it alone..