well maybe so theU.S constitution will make a law so women can vote
yes
John Hancock was against the constitution because it lacks in certain areas and needed to be re-looked
Common written history states that Elizabeth I never married, never bore children and died "without issue," ending England's Tudor Dynasty. (This is why Queen Elizabeth I is known as "The Virgin Queen.") The English throne passed to King James VI of Scotland, who became King James I of England. Although the two countries shared a monarch, they remained separate kingdoms. James was the son of Mary Queen of Scots, who was beheaded for plotting to overthrow Elizabeth (they were cousins).
Why_do_modern_day_scholars_oppose_beyers_waves_of_migration_theory
around the world it have things
No. I would not oppose an amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteeing Americans the right to marry someone of their own sex. I would, however, oppose an amendment that would ban same-sex marriage.
I would oppose such an amendment as a violation of states' rights as well as the civil rights of Americans.
order of importance novanet
order of importance novanet
Northern democrats opposed the thirteenth amendment for a variety of reasons. But mainly because of their different interpretation of the constitution. Many of them did not believe that " All man were created equal" should be taken literally.
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
Mayor Stanton supports same-sex marriage and is a member of Mayors for the Freedom to Marry.
James Madison did not oppose the ratification of the constitution. In fact he encouraged it by helping to write the Federalist papers with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay.
yes
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
the constitution did not include a bill of right...