Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.
When a virus encounters a cell, a series of chemical reactions occur that lead to the production of new viruses. These steps are completely passive, that is, they are predefined by the nature of the molecules that comprise the virus particle. Viruses don't actually 'do' anything. Often scientists and non-scientists alike ascribe actions to viruses such as employing, displaying, destroying, evading, exploiting, and so on. These terms are incorrect because viruses are passive, completely at the mercy of their environment
Viruses evolve primarily when they replicate and undergo mutations during their replication process. This can occur in response to environmental pressures, such as host immune responses or antiviral treatments. Additionally, viruses can exchange genetic material with other viruses through reassortment or recombination, leading to significant evolutionary changes. Overall, the rapid replication rates and high mutation frequencies of viruses facilitate their evolutionary adaptability.
Viruses rapidly evolve through high mutation rates, particularly in RNA viruses, where replication errors occur frequently. This genetic variability allows for quick adaptation to environmental pressures, such as host immune responses or antiviral treatments. Additionally, processes like recombination and reassortment can create new viral strains by mixing genetic material from different viruses, further accelerating evolution. These factors enable viruses to adapt swiftly and maintain their survival in changing conditions.
No, Maractus doesn't evolve.
Sawk does not evolve, nor does it evolve from anything.
absol does not evolve
Maybe because they divide & multiply, adapt/evolve, need a host(not sure about this part), etc.
Yes, viruses evolve over time. They will usually mutate into a stronger virus. When viruses face something new that could stop them, they usually mutate.
Emerging viruses
Some people argue that viruses are not alive because they lack any form of energy, carbon metabolism, and they canâ??t replicate or evolve. Therefore, they do not exhibit the same set of characteristics of all living things.
Viruses are not alive in the first place, so no.
Since viruses are not alive, they are not named by a genus or a species.
No, because viruses aren't alive.
-viruses and alive but bacteria is -viruses spread but dont multiply or change in your body, bacteria are alive and are often evolving -viruses cannot be treated, but bacteria can be eliminated with chemincals and anitbiotics
bacteria is but for viruses some scientists believe they are alive and others think they dont so i can't give you an answer to that
Certainly not. It is a hotly debated subject. Viruses (and prions for that matter) are not alive in a conventional sense.
Viruses are not an organism at all. They are not alive.
Viruses are not alive and so do not sleep. They can become inactive for a while.