answersLogoWhite

0

The Brady Bill, which mandated background checks for handgun purchases, faced constitutional challenges primarily concerning the Second Amendment and states' rights. Critics argued that it infringed on the rights of individuals to bear arms and imposed undue federal mandates on state and local law enforcement. In 1997, the Supreme Court ruled in Printz v. United States that the federal government could not commandeer state officers to enforce federal regulations, deeming aspects of the Brady Bill unconstitutional. Thus, while the intent to enhance gun control was upheld, the means through which it was enforced were found to violate the Constitution.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago

What else can I help you with?