result
A reliable test is one that has the same results over time. This means you can trust the test and its outcome.
Because thats science
Yes, an experiment can be reliable but not valid. Reliability refers to the consistency of the results when the experiment is repeated under the same conditions, while validity assesses whether the experiment measures what it is intended to measure. For instance, a poorly designed experiment may produce consistent results (reliable) but may not accurately reflect the true relationship between the variables being studied (not valid). This highlights the importance of both concepts in research design.
A book from the library
It is a brief measure of psychological disturbance,that is reliable and sensitive to changes patients make when they are in therapy
A reliable measure is consistent and yields consistent results, so it may not be measuring the intended construct accurately (lack validity). On the other hand, a valid measure accurately assesses the intended construct, but it must be consistent and produce stable results (reliable) to ensure that the measurements are dependable and trustworthy.
what is Consistent and reliable service
A torque-controlled fastener provides the most consistent clamping force after installation. Torque-controlled fasteners are tightened to a specific torque value, ensuring a reliable and consistent clamping force across multiple installations.
Cable internet is very reliable and provides high speed internet for an affordable price. Cable provides the most consistent internet and you should not expect much slow service at all. As a cable customer, I rarely have any problems.
A stable environment is one that is relatively consistent and reliable, with minimal fluctuations or disruptions. It provides a sense of security and predictability, allowing individuals or systems to operate efficiently and effectively. Factors such as consistent policies, reliable resources, and clear communication contribute to a stable environment.
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
The most reliable method to measure an earthquake's strength is the moment magnitude scale (Mw). This scale calculates the total energy released by an earthquake by considering factors such as seismic wave amplitude, the area of the fault that slipped, and the rigidity of the rocks involved. Unlike older scales, such as the Richter scale, the moment magnitude scale provides a more accurate and consistent measure, especially for large earthquakes. It is widely used by seismologists for its comprehensive approach to quantifying seismic events.
The measure that would remain consistent, no matter its location, is a constant.
When choosing a measuring instrument, consider the accuracy and precision required for your measurements, the range of values you need to measure, the ease of operation, the reliability and durability of the instrument, and your budget constraints. It's important to select an instrument that meets your specific measurement needs and provides results that are reliable and consistent.
Reliable.
Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object, while weight is a measure of the force of gravity acting on an object. Mass is constant regardless of location, but weight changes depending on the strength of gravity. In scientific calculations and comparisons, mass is a more consistent and reliable measure.
Consistent means offering the same standard of service over and over again.