It is true that scientific models are based on a set of observations, along with a logical analysis of those observations.
false
This is a false statement.
false
false
false
Scientific laws are based on repeated observations and evidence, so they are considered unlikely to change. However, they can be updated or refined based on new discoveries or insights, as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
This is false.
This is false.
The statement is false.
False [Apex]
true
false
This is a false statement.
true
Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.
This is a false statement.
Yes, some philosophers have formulated explanations about the nature of matter based on their own experiences. For example, Democritus proposed the idea of atoms based on his observations of the physical world. However, empirical evidence and scientific experimentation have played a significant role in shaping our contemporary understanding of the nature of matter.