answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
  • a.) Bacteria was present on the meat at the start of the experiment.
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Assume that bacteria appeared on the meat in all three jars How would most scientists today explain this observation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How scientists gather information?

It uses observation and experience to help explain natural phenomena


How do scientist gather information?

Scientists read and communicate with each other to gather information.


How is a theory and a observation related?

Scientists make observations about the natural world through experiments and try to explain the phenomena that they observe. Scientists then attempt to explain the occurence of all of these observations in an overarching theory. For example, an observation would be seeing an apple fall to the ground and making measurements. The next step would be taking all of these observations which could include things such as the movement of planets and other cosmic bodies to form the theory of gravity which attempts to explain these observations.


What term describes an observation pattern in nature without any attempt to explain it?

Observation.


In scientific inquiry making an observation typically leads to?

Forming a hypothesis - to explain the observation.


What is the major reason in earth science for scientists to construct models?

To help make predictions that can be tested by experiment or observation. Also to see or observe the model rather than to just explain it in words.


Does every scientific method begin with an observation?

That is true. Science tries to make sense of what is observed, to explain the universe in which we live. Until you make an observation, there is nothing to explain.


Explain how bacteria could be useful instead of hazardous?

explain how bacteria could be useful instead of hazardous.


What is a hypothesis that does not explain an observation?

When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.


An Attempt to explain observation that has already taken place?

I have no clue


What describes a natural event but does not explain why the event happens?

An observation.


What is the relationship between observation and explanation?

You must observe to explain.