Yes, a theory can be revised or replaced when new evidence or insights emerge that provide a more accurate or comprehensive explanation of a phenomenon. Scientific knowledge is dynamic and evolves over time, as researchers continually test and refine theories. This process is essential for advancing understanding and ensuring that explanations remain relevant and useful. Ultimately, the goal is to improve our grasp of the natural world through ongoing inquiry and critical evaluation.
That's true. A theory es exactly that - theory... Results from experimentation can prove or disprove a theory.
Because they may not apply in all situations.The first law of thermodynamics is true everywhere.The second law of thermodynamics isn't true inside the event horizon of a black holeThe third law of thermodynamics isn't a law but merely a point of reference to make measurements from.Newtonian laws of motion are not absolutely true but are only approximately true but valid for things that travel at less than 1/2 the speed of light.
useful support for his theory
Yes. An Hypothesis is the question we first ask, and a Theory is a scientific explanation that is repeatable and may also have predictive value.Theories that have repeated high reliability are often called Laws, such as the Law of Gravity, Ohm's Law, and so on.Whereas we have a theory of relativity, or of music, or of evolution. These are believed to be true and are very useful, but may not be absolute.But we still only call it 'Pythagoras' Theorem', even if it does work every time, so the definitions of these terms are not perfectly rigorous.
variable
true
True
That's true. A theory es exactly that - theory... Results from experimentation can prove or disprove a theory.
Theories aren't considered absolute truths because science is always changing; as new evidence is uncovered, a theory may be revised or replaced by a more useful explanation.
Yes, Dalton's atomic model is still a useful conceptual framework for understanding the basic structure of matter. However, it has been revised and expanded upon with modern advancements in atomic theory such as the discovery of subatomic particles.
Copernicus developed an interim theory of the planets in which the Sun was at the centre instead of the Earth as had previously been believed. Although Copernicus's theory only lasted from 1543 to 1609 when Kepler's theory replaced it, it is regarded as a useful step along the way.
Because they may not apply in all situations.The first law of thermodynamics is true everywhere.The second law of thermodynamics isn't true inside the event horizon of a black holeThe third law of thermodynamics isn't a law but merely a point of reference to make measurements from.Newtonian laws of motion are not absolutely true but are only approximately true but valid for things that travel at less than 1/2 the speed of light.
To help get into the criminal mind. Artixthepaladin
No; chaos theory is more useful to explain why hurricanes CANNOT be predicted.
pagal
This link may be useful as an introduction.
scientist accepted bohr's model as a useful explanation (apex)