Because they may not apply in all situations.
The first law of thermodynamics is true everywhere.
The second law of thermodynamics isn't true inside the event horizon of a black hole
The third law of thermodynamics isn't a law but merely a point of reference to make measurements from.
Newtonian laws of motion are not absolutely true but are only approximately true but valid for things that travel at less than 1/2 the speed of light.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
Theories
A model is an explanation of why an event occurs, and how data and events are related. So theories and hypothesis are testable statements and broad generalizations to compare data and to collect data.
Scientific theories are comprehensive explanations of phenomena based on extensive evidence and observation, providing insights into why things happen. In contrast, scientific laws describe observable relationships or patterns in nature, often expressed mathematically, without explaining the underlying reasons. While theories can evolve with new evidence, laws remain consistent descriptions of what occurs under specific conditions. Essentially, theories address the "how" and "why," while laws focus on the "what" of natural phenomena.
Laws have been proven, theories have not
all theories don't become laws
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Scientific theories.
Theories and laws serve different purposes in science. Theories are explanations that integrate and explain data from various observations, while laws are concise descriptions of a particular phenomenon. Theories are more comprehensive and can be modified or refined with new evidence, whereas laws are typically more general and do not change. Thus, theories are not elevated to laws but can support them.
the laws of motion
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.
theories :)
theories :)
Scientific theories usually come before scientific laws. Theories are comprehensive explanations of a wide range of observations and data, while laws are concise statements describing specific relationships or patterns within a system. Theories often precede the formulation of laws as they help to understand and predict natural phenomena before they can be distilled into succinct laws.
Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.