"Can a theory be proven incorrect?" absolutely, even after it has been successfully proven a "good scientific theory" (proven as in experimented, documented, tested ect...... )The theory itself can be retested and then also be proven to be incorrect. Such as subtle changes in the environment of which the study was tested can alter the results to be give a true or false outcome. Thus, in my opinion much of the reasoning behind the statement nothing in the World is absolutely 100%.
If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
yes it can
yes it can prove ....
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
That would depend on the scientific theory in question.
If all the evidence taken into consideration can be explained by the scientific model proposed and the model successfully predicts outcomes of experiments yet to be performed, it is a "good scientific theory" It still can be incorrect. If it is proven incorrect it should be abandoned.
yes it can
yes it can prove ....
yes you can, in theory. But it is very difficult to change an established 'ruling paradigm' (however incorrect).
When there wrong about there theory. Like for example , if a scientist creates a new theory, but research proved it incorrect.
Scientific theorums are normally discarded after they have been proven to be wrong after a series of testing to verify if the theory was correct or not. Scientific theorums can take years, sometimes decades to be proven to be correct or incorrect.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
Between Scientific Theory and what?
Scientific observations and experimental results are required for a theory to be scientific.
First off that's not a word, and any scientific theory can be debunked if a better theory replaces it or the evidence begins to point in a different direction thus debasing the previous theory.
A conceptual scheme in science that is strongly supported but has not been found incorrect is considered a well-established theory. This means that it has withstood repeated testing and scrutiny and remains the most accurate explanation for a set of phenomena. Examples include the theory of evolution in biology and the theory of relativity in physics.