0
It can go both ways. Many people have been helped due to advances in genetic knowledge, which has allowed us to further our treatment for many medical conditions.
Billions of people's lives have been saved or helped due to vaccinations, which have pretty much wiped out diseases like polio and mmr. Without advances in genetic knowledge, developing and improving these medicines would be impossible.
However, there are risks to genetic experimentation. Since it's not perfect, there are possible side-affects and things that could go wrong, which is why medicines are extensively tested before available to the public.
There is also controversy in stem cell research. Many believe that this is morally wrong for the baby, but so far scientists have found no major side-affects or harm to the baby from this type of research.
What else can I help you with?
Why do scientist replicate other scientist experiment?
They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.
After the scientist makes a hypothesis they perform a to collect data?
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
A scientist performs an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a scientific theory The scientist repeats the experiment several times and gets the same results The scientist then?
The scientific theory should be changed.
A scientist does an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a major scientific theory What should the scientist do?
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
What do scientist use to do their experiments?
The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.
Why do the yeti walk in the mountins?
they do not want to be spotted and be known because humans will try to kill it. And scientist will experiment them
What could happen if a scientist does not conduct a controlled variable?
you might not get the experiment correct (:
Why do scientist replicate other scientist experiment?
They might just want to retest ,but there are other reasons not everyone could be sure of that.
How can a rejected hypothesis be of value to a scientist?
the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory
Could you provide a sentence for Hypothesis?
The Scientist gave a very strong Hypothesis on his experiment
What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
After the scientist makes a hypothesis they perform a to collect data?
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
A scientist performs an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a scientific theory The scientist repeats the experiment several times and gets the same results The scientist then?
The scientific theory should be changed.
A scientist does an experiment The results of the experiment disagree with a major scientific theory What should the scientist do?
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
What is the object in the sentence during the experiment the scientist continued on despite the risk.?
In the sentence "During the experiment, the scientist continued on despite the risk," the object is "the experiment." It is the thing that the scientist is engaging in, while "the risk" acts as an obstacle or consideration that the scientist is choosing to ignore.
Is it true that scientist who performs an experiment has no idea what the outcome of the experiment is going to be?
Many times, the scientist has a fair amount of confidence that the experiment will perform according to the prediction.
What is an experiment that you could do to find out if dogs can see colors?
Kill the dog,take out the eyes and give a scientist to test it.
