The goal of scientific models is that the scientific models help see something more clearly in science.
Scientific models are continually refined through experimentation. When experimental results, which violate the model, have been confirmed by a third-party then scientists seeks to change the model such that the results can be explained.
No, good scientific models should always be open for change. They should be tested and tested repeatedly, so they can be revised, or scrapped in favour of a better hypothesis.
Well if we didn't have any models and so we would not have any models
It is true that scientific models are based on a set of observations, along with a logical analysis of those observations.
I ate a taco in 2005 it was yummy!
Scientist are always testing their models to get new information or results, but other times learning evidence makes scientist have to change their models so scientist can change their models in theory.
yes they can be changed!Scientific models change to reflect ongoing research to explain discrepancies in current theory versus actual experimental results.
The goal of scientific models is that the scientific models help see something more clearly in science.
Scientific models are continually refined through experimentation. When experimental results, which violate the model, have been confirmed by a third-party then scientists seeks to change the model such that the results can be explained.
No, good scientific models should always be open for change. They should be tested and tested repeatedly, so they can be revised, or scrapped in favour of a better hypothesis.
Scientific models can't show 100% of the reality that they model. Models are necessarily simplified versions of reality.
New scientific models are developed in order to reflect the most recent discoveries.
No
Psychology is the same as scientific equities
Well if we didn't have any models and so we would not have any models
Yes. If a scientific theory cannot be "falsified" - that is, proven to be not true - then it isn't "scientific". A scientific theory will always lead to some tests that can be performed. If the test fails - that is to say, if your theory doesn't behave in accordance with the experimental results - then we can say that the theory is "disproved". This is the problem with a lot of the "global warming" and "global climate change" hysteria; the computer models for climate change make a number of predictions, but the models don't behave as predicted. The global climate change theory is, if we judge by the results of the models, disproved.