Light reflected back off the atomic nucleus of the particlar metal involved is interferred with by the electron field to give a lustre to metals and similarly with other solids. Colour is just a result of differing light absorbtions
No. Solids are just an illusion. "Everything you've learned in school as 'obvious' becomes less and less obvious as you begin to study the universe. For example, there are no solids in the universe. There's not even a suggestion of a solid. There are no absolute continuums. There are no surfaces. There are no straight lines." -R. Buckminster Fuller
RBF is correct in what he says, in that the nuclei of atoms aren't touching, but since it's the electron clouds that repel or bond together, and the electrons are part of the atom, it's arguable that the atoms are touching when they're covalently bonded. There's not much "space" at all if you define it like that.
The carbon atoms in diamond are all bonded alike in all directions, with very little room at all to be the difference between the size of the diamond itself and the size of its individual atoms all added up. However, it is difficult to define "solid" in atoms. The nucleus is a grain of rice compared to a football stadium volume for the electron orbitals. There is absolutely nothing in between. In neutron stars, however, the electron orbitals have collapsed, and in black holes, even the nuclei have collapsed....and space itself. Maybe that's solid!
ugh can solids be invisable what are you talking about girl what the heck are solids
Not that i Know of really it is probrably a term because it looks like it is invisible
Yes. Solids can have any shape, and usually take on that of the container they were in when the temperature went below their freezing point.
Particles in a true monophasic solution are invisible.
Yes. The particles in a solution are invisible.
The solids have definite shape they have definite volume they have high density they are packed ie.not compressible
I can only tell you that gases are does not have a difinite shape and volume . E.g air / nitrogen / carbon dioxide / water vapour / . . .
have a strong attractive force
Solids are hard but liquids have no feeling. Solids have a shape but liquids do not.
Liquids. They will take the shape of whatever you pour them into. As opposed to solids. Hard to pour a brick into anything.
Yes, solids have a definite shape
No. Solids are resistant to changes in both shape and volume.
Solids change their shapes in many ways. Solids will melt if they are in hot temperatures, and this changes their shape.
Solids have a fixed volume or shape at room temperature or pressure.
Solids don't change their size or shape.
Only solids have a definite shape. Neither liquids nor gases have a definite shape.Only solids have a definite shape. Neither liquids nor gases have a definite shape.Only solids have a definite shape. Neither liquids nor gases have a definite shape.Only solids have a definite shape. Neither liquids nor gases have a definite shape.
any shape you want it to be
defnite shape
solids
no solids are not in same shape they differ according to their shape and size due to intermolecular forces of attraction. submitted by sapan
Solids have a definite shape and size. This is where solids differ from liquids and gases, for which the same cannot be said.
Yes. Solids have shapes and volume. Liquids take they're own shape and gas spreads.