0
The answer to this is subjective and therefore it cannot be answered. Some people will agree with it and some people disagree.
Most people with a college education will agree with the scientific explanation of the world. This may be in part based upon learning the scientific attitude and processes.
Many people, college degree or not, are firm religious believers and will disagree with the scientific approach. The firm religious learn a faith based system as opposed to the scientific approach. The faith based systems do not promote acceptance of things outside their system.
<<>> opinions can be agreed with or disagreed with, but facts are facts. The scientific method seeks to separate out facts from opinions by looking for evidence.
What else can I help you with?
How do you evaluate scientific explanations?
how are scientific laws formed
What is the basis for scientific explanations?
emperical evidence
Should scientific explanations be logical and testable?
Answer it for me.
How did the scientific revolution change during the scientific revolution?
The scientific method was developed as a means of probing how things actually worked. This rational approach to explaining the natural world, replaced magical explanations and religious dogma.
Why is creativity important in constructing scientific explanations?
some scientific reasearch investigates phenomena that are hard to explain
How do you evaluate scientific explanations?
how are scientific laws formed
What are scientific explanations are built on?
Facts.
What is the basis for scientific explanations?
emperical evidence
What does the scientific inquiry refer to?
scientific inquirry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on evidence they gather
Should scientific explanations be logical and testable?
Answer it for me.
How did the scientific revolution change during the scientific revolution?
The scientific method was developed as a means of probing how things actually worked. This rational approach to explaining the natural world, replaced magical explanations and religious dogma.
What Explanations for occurrences in the natural world should be based on .?
Explanations for occurrences in the natural world should be based on empirical evidence, scientific reasoning, and reproducibility. They need to rely on observations and experiments that can be tested and verified, adhering to the principles of the scientific method. Additionally, these explanations should be open to revision as new evidence emerges, ensuring they remain accurate and relevant. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of natural phenomena and promotes critical thinking.
Do scientists agree that the world will end in the year 2000?
No, scientists do not agree that the world will end in the year 2000. Predictions about the world ending are not supported by scientific evidence and are considered pseudoscience. The world continues to exist beyond the year 2000 based on scientific understanding.
What is a possible explanations for a set of observations or answer to a scientific question?
A theory
Which word is best used as a synonym for scientific conclusions?
explanations
What refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on from what they gather?
The diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose explanations based on gathered information is known as the scientific method. This method involves making observations, forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. It is a systematic approach to understanding the world around us.
Why is creativity important in constructing scientific explanations?
some scientific reasearch investigates phenomena that are hard to explain
