Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
In a Colloquial sense, yes, in common day speech, a theory is simply an educated opinion, however, in a scientific context, A theory is the highest degree of proof available, in science, a theory is the combination of all available data on a particular matter that allows a person to establish knowledge on a preexistent hypothesis. To be a theory, something must not contradict existing knowledge, it must have faced scrutiny and survived, and must have made apt predictions that have been confirmed by rigorous experimentation. I hope that helps :)
Saying a scientific question must be supportable means it must be answerable through evidence-based methods and data. It implies that the question should be structured in a way that allows for investigation and testing to reach a valid conclusion.
A scientific hypothesis is testable, falsifiable, and based on empirical evidence. It must be formulated in a way that allows it to be disproven through experimentation or observation, making it a key component of the scientific method.
One is based of a wealth of evidence and scientific inquiry. The other is based on the idea that life is too complex and those must have had a designer.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
A scientific name must have the Genus then the species. The genus is always capitalized and the species is lower case. If it is typed it must be italicized and if it is written it must be underlined.Example: Homo sapiens
A model is a visual or mathematical representation used to develop scientific explanations. It must conform to known experimental results and predict future experiment results accurately.
A scientific theory must be based on many repeated correct experiments; also this theory must be related with other accepted theories.
Yes, that is exactly true. Even if the tests reveal something else, they must be testable by many other scientists. There is a way to do this called the scientific method.
In a Colloquial sense, yes, in common day speech, a theory is simply an educated opinion, however, in a scientific context, A theory is the highest degree of proof available, in science, a theory is the combination of all available data on a particular matter that allows a person to establish knowledge on a preexistent hypothesis. To be a theory, something must not contradict existing knowledge, it must have faced scrutiny and survived, and must have made apt predictions that have been confirmed by rigorous experimentation. I hope that helps :)
Science is based on faith in four issues that confirm many scientific theories:Evidence. Scientists must look for evidence to support or refute scientific theories.Consistency. Scientific theories must be internally consistent and consistent with other scientific theories in the same context.Repeatability. Scientific experiments must capable of being repeated by other researchers, who can endorse or contradict the original findings.Predictability. A good scientific theory should be able to predict facts not yet known.If it were not possible to have total faith in these issues, then scientific knowledge would be no more reliable than religious dogma.
some measure of examining the information