Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
In a Colloquial sense, yes, in common day speech, a theory is simply an educated opinion, however, in a scientific context, A theory is the highest degree of proof available, in science, a theory is the combination of all available data on a particular matter that allows a person to establish knowledge on a preexistent hypothesis. To be a theory, something must not contradict existing knowledge, it must have faced scrutiny and survived, and must have made apt predictions that have been confirmed by rigorous experimentation. I hope that helps :)
Saying a scientific question must be supportable means it must be answerable through evidence-based methods and data. It implies that the question should be structured in a way that allows for investigation and testing to reach a valid conclusion.
A scientific hypothesis is testable, falsifiable, and based on empirical evidence. It must be formulated in a way that allows it to be disproven through experimentation or observation, making it a key component of the scientific method.
One is based of a wealth of evidence and scientific inquiry. The other is based on the idea that life is too complex and those must have had a designer.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
A scientific model must be able to accurately represent and simplify complex phenomena, allowing for predictions and explanations of various outcomes. It should be based on empirical data and validated through experimentation and observation. Additionally, a good scientific model should be adaptable, enabling revisions as new evidence emerges. Ultimately, it serves as a tool to enhance understanding and facilitate communication within the scientific community.
A scientific name must have the Genus then the species. The genus is always capitalized and the species is lower case. If it is typed it must be italicized and if it is written it must be underlined.Example: Homo sapiens
A model is a visual or mathematical representation used to develop scientific explanations. It must conform to known experimental results and predict future experiment results accurately.
A scientific theory must be based on many repeated correct experiments; also this theory must be related with other accepted theories.
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena based on a body of evidence and are subject to testing and refinement. They are not mere guesses but rather comprehensive frameworks that can predict outcomes and are supported by repeated experimentation. Importantly, scientific theories can evolve as new evidence emerges, differentiating them from laws, which describe observable phenomena without explaining why they occur. Overall, theories are foundational to scientific understanding and must withstand rigorous scrutiny.
Scientific theories aren't considered absolute truths because they are based on current evidence and understanding, which can evolve over time. New discoveries or insights can lead to revisions or even replacements of existing theories. Additionally, scientific theories are inherently provisional and subject to testing and falsification, meaning they must withstand rigorous scrutiny and experimentation. Thus, they represent our best explanations based on available data rather than definitive truths.
The six criteria of science typically include the following: Empirical Evidence: Scientific claims must be based on observable and measurable phenomena. Testability: Hypotheses must be testable and falsifiable through experiments or observations. Reproducibility: Results should be reproducible by others using the same methods. Peer Review: Scientific findings should undergo peer review to ensure validity and reliability. Predictive Power: Theories should be able to make accurate predictions about future events or observations. Consistency: Scientific explanations must be consistent with existing knowledge and evidence.