Explanations must be Consistent.
The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena.
If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned.
Explanations must be Testable.
Explanations must be examined in
laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and
must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must
be changed or abandoned.
Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple).
Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent
with what is already known or that are untestable.
Facts.
Scientific explanations must always be based on empirical evidence and observations that can be tested and verified. They rely on the scientific method, which includes formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. Additionally, these explanations should be reproducible and subject to peer review to ensure their validity and reliability within the scientific community.
The scientific method is the most commonly used framework to guide scientific inquiries and evaluate proposed explanations by other scientists. It involves formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test the hypothesis, analyzing results, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. Peer review by other scientists is also crucial for evaluating and validating scientific explanations.
Websites like National Geographic, Smithsonian Institution, or the U.S. Geological Survey provide detailed and scientific explanations about Mount Krakatoa, its history, eruptions, and impact on the environment. They offer comprehensive articles, images, and data to educate readers about this famous volcano.
A scientific explanation of a natural occurrence is called a theory or a hypothesis, depending on the level of evidence and support behind it. Theories are well-established explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while hypotheses are proposed explanations that require further testing and evidence to confirm.
how are scientific laws formed
Facts.
emperical evidence
Answer it for me.
Scientific explanations must always be based on empirical evidence and observations that can be tested and verified. They rely on the scientific method, which includes formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. Additionally, these explanations should be reproducible and subject to peer review to ensure their validity and reliability within the scientific community.
explanations
A theory
some scientific reasearch investigates phenomena that are hard to explain
THERE are none, it is just music from the feet:)
Strength and usefulness of claims are evaluated through scientific argumentation.
A visual or mathematical representation used to develop scientific explanations is called a model. A model can be a diagram, graph, equation, or any other representation that helps scientists understand and explain a scientific phenomenon or process. Models are used to simplify complex concepts and aid in the development of theories and predictions.
Question needs clarifications