logical and respect the rules of evidence, consistent with experimental and observational evidence about nature, and clearly reported to enhance opportunities for further investigation.
Theories
Scientific explanations must always be based on empirical evidence and observations that can be tested and verified. They rely on the scientific method, which includes formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. Additionally, these explanations should be reproducible and subject to peer review to ensure their validity and reliability within the scientific community.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Facts.
Forensic Science is the application of scientific methods and techniques to analyze and interpret physical evidence in criminal investigations. It involves using scientific principles to solve crimes and provide evidence for legal proceedings.
Theories
Theories
Scientific explanations must always be based on empirical evidence and observations that can be tested and verified. They rely on the scientific method, which includes formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. Additionally, these explanations should be reproducible and subject to peer review to ensure their validity and reliability within the scientific community.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Commission for Scientific Investigations in Greenland was created in 1878.
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Because you repeat investigation to look for errors.
his own scientific investigations.
how are scientific laws formed
Scientists often repeat scientific investigations to verify that the results for a hypothesis or a group of hypotheses are correct. This can lead to a scientific theory.
Scientific investigations must be replicable to ensure that findings are reliable and can be verified by other researchers. Replication helps to confirm results, identify any errors or biases, and strengthens the overall validity of scientific claims. It also fosters trust in the scientific process by allowing others to independently verify results, leading to a more robust understanding of phenomena. Ultimately, replicability is essential for the progression of knowledge and the development of scientific theories.