0
Evidence supports a model in which periods of relative stability are punctuated by short periods of rapid (relatively speaking) change. It could, theoretically, be possible for evolution to proceed in a gradual manner. However, mathematical modelling and fossil evidence show that punctuated equilibrium is the norm.
What else can I help you with?
What is a statement that does not have experimental evidence to support it?
Hypothesis.
Which is the best question to ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
What is any piece of data that can support an assertion?
evidence
How is evidence from data used to support the conclusion?
booboo penis
How do you support a hypothesis?
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
What evidence supports both punctuated equilibrium and gradualism?
The fossil record and observations of extant organisms support both punctuated equilibrium and gradualism. Transitional fossil forms represent periods of gradual change, while sudden appearances of new species or rapid changes in morphology can indicate episodes of punctuated equilibrium. Both patterns are consistent with the theory of evolution, each reflecting different modes of evolutionary change over time.
Is fossil record considered scientific theory?
Probably more in the line of many converging pieces of evidence in support of theory. Theory is explanation and fossils are just mineralized bones in the rock. which need and explanation. The fossil record supports the theory of evolution by natural selection and, some say, the theory of punctuated equilibrium.
What are current theries that conflict with Darwin's theory what evidence is used to support thses theories?
Current theories that conflict with Darwin's theory of evolution include Lamarckism, which suggests acquired traits can be passed down through generations, and Saltationism, which proposes that large evolutionary changes can happen suddenly. Supporters of Lamarckism cite cases of epigenetics as evidence, while proponents of Saltationism point to instances of punctuated equilibrium in the fossil record to support their claims.
What does corroborate mean?
Corroborate means to strengthen or support with evidence.
What question should a writer ask when choosing evidence to support a claim?
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
Which question would best help a writer choose evidence to support a claim?
Does this evidence support what I am trying to say
What evidence did Wegeners have to support his theory?
Fossils support his hypothesis.
What written evidence is there to support the practices of religion?
the holy books are the evidence
What is a present evidence?
Presumably, it is in reference to the evidence that will be, or was, presented in support of the prosecution.
Can you provide any evidence to support the claim that he is not the father"?
Yes, DNA testing can provide evidence to support the claim that he is not the father.
What does corroborate?
Confirm, support with evidence
What evidence support your claim?
Fjh
