answersLogoWhite

0

I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't know the case you are asking about.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Does the case by itself prove the theory explain why or why or why not?

A case by itself does not prove a theory because it typically provides only a single instance or example, which may not be representative of broader patterns or principles. While a case can support a theory by illustrating its applicability, multiple cases and consistent findings are necessary to establish robust evidence. Additionally, alternative explanations and variables must be considered to validate the theory comprehensively. Thus, a single case is insufficient for definitive proof.


Does the case of mesosaurus by itself prove the theory?

The case of Mesosaurus does not by itself prove the theory of continental drift, but it provides significant evidence supporting it. Mesosaurus was a freshwater reptile found in both South America and Africa, suggesting these continents were once joined. The existence of similar fossils on widely separated landmasses is difficult to explain without considering continental movement. However, additional evidence from geology, paleomagnetism, and other fossil types further supports the theory.


Is it more difficult to prove guilt or responsibility in a criminal case than in a civil case?

A criminal case is harder to prove, as the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt." A civil case only has to be by a "preponderance of the evidence" which is anything over half.


which property can you use to prove that ME is congruent to itself?

reflexive property of congruence


What can evidence provide?

Evidence can prove, or disprove, the case against you.


How do you prove that a number is a composite?

To prove whether a number is composite, factor it. A number having any factor besides 1 and itself is composite.


Can i be positive that my attorney will prove police corruption in my case?

If the attorney can prove the officer's intent to violate your rights, or a statute, your case is likely to raise concerns: if nothing else. If the attorney cannot prove that the officer knowingly and intentionally violated a statute, you probably do not have a case. That being said, you can never be "positive" of anything in the justice system.


What do the two products of the combustion of methane prove about methane itself?

it contains carbon


What is the key to a successful rebuttal in a disparate treatment case?

to prove discrimination


What happened to all the Zodiac detectives and their lives after they could not prove anything in that murder case?

They moved on to a new case.


Does correlation always equal causation?

No! Correlation by itself is not sufficient to infer or prove causation.


Is the saying Case and point?

No. You mean "a case in point" A case in point is an example that helps to prove your argument eg "The weather is unpredictable, last week's hurricanes were a case in point."