To begin with, a theory can not prove or disprove anything until it is proven itself.
No facts currently known to science contradict the fundamental theses of evolutionary theory.
First of all, evolution is a FACT not a theory. You must be referring to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by means of natural selection. There is no denying the fact that evolution happens, scientists just didn't know exactly how it worked until Darwin suggested one plausible scientific explanation which he called natural selection. Natural selection is simply the change in allele frequencies of an organism which results that organism becoming either better or worse suited to survive in its environment. Being better suited to survive means that the organism is more likely to pass on the beneficial genetic trait to it's offspring. Rather than asking for evidence which helps prove evolution, try looking for verifiable scientific evidence which disproves it. After all, science is not about making claims and looking for evidence to prove them, but rather generating hypothesis and looking for ways to disprove them.
be testable
Making predictions & then testing them.
Making predictions & then testing them.
Yes
Simply; none.
None have as of yet.
Evolution was the starting point for Reincarnation.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.
Without heredity what use would there be to selection and why evolution? Just take beneficial mutations in the germ line for example. No heredity and nothing to enter the populations gene pool and no evolution. No heredity and there would be no variation in populations and the first environmental challenge would carry your population to extinction.
No fossils disprove evolution, but support it
No. It merely shows the method God may have used.
No facts currently known to science contradict the fundamental theses of evolutionary theory.
A classic way to disprove evolution by means of fossils would be to find a fossil rabbit in Pre-Cambrian sedimentary rocks. Of course, that can never happen.
No. Any string of logic that attempts to disprove God will defeat itself.There is nothing even close to adequately explaining how 'evolution' began. On the other hand, that may not necessarily remain true (see also: abiogenesis research), but even if we have a naturalistic explanation for the origin of life, this will do nothing to disprove the claim that God exists.
First of all, evolution is a FACT not a theory. You must be referring to Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by means of natural selection. There is no denying the fact that evolution happens, scientists just didn't know exactly how it worked until Darwin suggested one plausible scientific explanation which he called natural selection. Natural selection is simply the change in allele frequencies of an organism which results that organism becoming either better or worse suited to survive in its environment. Being better suited to survive means that the organism is more likely to pass on the beneficial genetic trait to it's offspring. Rather than asking for evidence which helps prove evolution, try looking for verifiable scientific evidence which disproves it. After all, science is not about making claims and looking for evidence to prove them, but rather generating hypothesis and looking for ways to disprove them.