No facts currently known to science contradict the fundamental theses of evolutionary theory.
To begin with, a theory can not prove or disprove anything until it is proven itself.
Ideally, all accepted facts would be absolutely, irrefutably true. However, mistakes are sometimes made and accepted facts can be disproved. I guess, technically, no "fact" is ever truly irrefutable, as anyone can try to disprove the findings of another person. (They can attempt to refute it.)
Answer 1A theory. Just as E=Mc2 is the theory of relativity.Answer 2Evolution is both a fact and a theory, although the fact and the theory of evolution are - at least in my book - two different things:The fact of evolution is the observation that lifeforms evolve over time.The theory of evolution is the model that explains how they evolve, and how that applies to our findings in genetics and palaeontology. The theory of evolution incorporates a number of well-tested hypotheses, laws, and facts.
be testable
Making predictions & then testing them.
Yes
Simply; none.
None have as of yet.
Evolution was the starting point for Reincarnation.
They do not. Nothing "disproves" evolution. It is impossible to prove or disprove anything scientifically. That's a basic rule of science: everything is subjected to doubt.
No fossils disprove evolution, but support it
No. It merely shows the method God may have used.
No where. Science has yet to prove or disprove Creationism
A classic way to disprove evolution by means of fossils would be to find a fossil rabbit in Pre-Cambrian sedimentary rocks. Of course, that can never happen.
To begin with, a theory can not prove or disprove anything until it is proven itself.
The broad basis of an investigation is to either prove or disprove the facts - be they criminal, civil, scientific, and so on.
No. Any string of logic that attempts to disprove God will defeat itself.There is nothing even close to adequately explaining how 'evolution' began. On the other hand, that may not necessarily remain true (see also: abiogenesis research), but even if we have a naturalistic explanation for the origin of life, this will do nothing to disprove the claim that God exists.