0
What else can I help you with?
What do scientists do to determine if their results support their hypothesis?
The results can support their hypothesis by comparing the results, or setting them out in a table or graph. Conclusions can also be written to simplify the process.
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
What statements best describe scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge?
Scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge and literature come from all races. Working individually and in cooperative teams, scientists test various hypotheses using strict methods and retesting. These scientists are never content to accept the first apparent result, but religiously assess the methods used so they can prevent false results. They re-question, re-assess, re-test, and re-evaluate from all angles and do not accept common beliefs, assumptions, or myths without careful scientific experiments, testing, and proofs that support the hypothesis. Scientists, like genealogists, understand the power of a "negative result", that is, results that disprove or that do not support the hypothesis. Because they rigidly look for the smallest proof that disproves the working hypothesis, scientists are likely the only body of professionals who are willing to discard a working hypothesis based on scientific results even if it means trashing years of work, and creating a new hypothesis that takes into account all positive (supporting) and negative (disproving) results from their previous work.
Did scientist rely heavily or imaginationyo carry out their whork?
Scientists often rely on imagination to form hypotheses from which to work. However, once the hypothesis is formed, they work from known facts towards a solution.
What are the activities involved in scientific method?
Multiple activities are involved in executing the scientific method. These include the formation of a hypothesis/thesis, research, reading, experimental testing, modeling, citation of sources and peer review.
What does a scientists do if a hypothesis is supported?
it is better at their work
How do scientists make predictions?
Scientists make predictions with a hypothesis. Using their observations, models, and other scientists' work, they create a statement of a possible outcome called a hypothesis. Then scientists design tests to check whether their prediction was true.
How did the scientific revolution change they in which scientist did their work?
Scientists were expected to conduct experiments to prove / disprove their hypothesis and theories.
What do scientists do to determine if their results support their hypothesis?
The results can support their hypothesis by comparing the results, or setting them out in a table or graph. Conclusions can also be written to simplify the process.
What hypothesis did Burrhus frederic have?
Burrhus Frederic Skinner's hypothesis was a lack there of. This psychologist preferred not to rationalize from others' work or to study the work of other scientists and psychologists. Burrhus Frederic Skinner preferred not to apply a hypotheses to his studies.
In animal fields studies why do the scientists usually try to work without making the animals aware that humans are present?
Because , animal field studies help the scientists provide data , and work with the hypothesis
What best describes scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge?
Scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge and literature come from all races. Working individually and in cooperative teams, scientists test various hypotheses using strict methods and retesting. These scientists are never content to accept the first apparent result, but religiously assess the methods used so they can prevent false results. They re-question, re-assess, re-test, and re-evaluate from all angles and do not accept common beliefs, assumptions, or myths without careful scientific experiments, testing, and proofs that support the hypothesis. Scientists, like genealogists, understand the power of a "negative result", that is, results that disprove or that do not support the hypothesis. Because they rigidly look for the smallest proof that disproves the working hypothesis, scientists are likely the only body of professionals who are willing to discard a working hypothesis based on scientific results even if it means trashing years of work, and creating a new hypothesis that takes into account all positive (supporting) and negative (disproving) results from their previous work.
Have scientists made medicine by using animal testing?
Without animal testing there would be no medicine as we understand today.Insulin penicillin and chemotherapy exist only because of this crucial work
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
What statements best describe scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge?
Scientists who contribute to the current body of scientific knowledge and literature come from all races. Working individually and in cooperative teams, scientists test various hypotheses using strict methods and retesting. These scientists are never content to accept the first apparent result, but religiously assess the methods used so they can prevent false results. They re-question, re-assess, re-test, and re-evaluate from all angles and do not accept common beliefs, assumptions, or myths without careful scientific experiments, testing, and proofs that support the hypothesis. Scientists, like genealogists, understand the power of a "negative result", that is, results that disprove or that do not support the hypothesis. Because they rigidly look for the smallest proof that disproves the working hypothesis, scientists are likely the only body of professionals who are willing to discard a working hypothesis based on scientific results even if it means trashing years of work, and creating a new hypothesis that takes into account all positive (supporting) and negative (disproving) results from their previous work.
How to describe the process of scientific theory construction and testing?
The process of scientific theory construction and testing can be explained as and approach used to to gather information and ideas for a subject and then putting them into action. Testing these theories will show whether an idea or concept will work successfully or not.
Did scientist rely heavily or imaginationyo carry out their whork?
Scientists often rely on imagination to form hypotheses from which to work. However, once the hypothesis is formed, they work from known facts towards a solution.
