The scientific method cannot definitively prove a hypothesis; rather, it tests hypotheses through observation and experimentation. A hypothesis is formulated based on existing knowledge and then subjected to rigorous testing. If the experimental results consistently support the hypothesis, it gains credibility, but it remains open to revision or rejection based on new evidence. Ultimately, the scientific method allows for the refinement of hypotheses rather than absolute proof.
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it.
ANALYZE
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
Hypothesis
third
A hypothesis is simply a statement that a person makes and then tries to prove or disprove using the scientific method.
prove that the hypothesis is wrong
The Scientific Method begins with posing questions on the natural world.
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it.
For a hypothesis to be put forward as a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it.
ANALYZE
the scientific method :)
no, the scientific method is how scientists determine whether their ideas have any real-world merits.>in the Scientific Method they have the identification of the problem or purpose in why they are going to do something then the experiment so after observation they can come up with a hypothesis which is their opinion on the case and then they will try to prove that their hypothesis is real and there they had the idea or result that solves the problem or purpose.
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
What is a series of carefully planned steps that test a hypothesis?
Hypothesis