Mendel's laws deal with the transmission of genes between individuals. Evolution deals with changes in gene frequencies within and between populations.Population genetics, which mathematically analyzes how gene frequencies change over time in populations, is the backbone of evolutionary genetics, and it is based on Mendelian genetics being the transmission mechanism for individuals. So, the statement that Mendel's work "raises great obstacles" to evolutionary theory is simply ignorant and misleading.
Mendelian genetics support evolutionary theory in every way.
Actually, it doesn't. Darwin was unaware of Mendel's theory when he wrote his theory of Evolution (even though they lived at the same time), and because of the strong belief in Darwin's ideas it was not until the early 20'th century that the importance of the Mendelian theory was realized.
The Mendelian theory - because it showed that genes are own entities - raises great obstacles for the Darwinian theory. Natural selection operates on the organism level, rather than the gene level (the whole organism dies, if only one single fatal mutation occurs), which will mean that all the "good" mutations that need to add up during long time will get lost due only to a small number of fatal mutations, which makes it even more impossible for natural selection to give rise to something new which needs adding up of "good mutations".
The concept of "good mutations" - mutations that will be good only when many such mutations have been added together - is itself an erroneous way of thinking, because it builds on teleological reasoning (things get their "meaning" only after something has happened and you see the result) rather than causal reasoning ("cause gives effect"). Teleological reasoning is not rational in a naturalistic framework, because the only thing there is in such a framework is "cause gives effect".
There are alternate versions of a gene.
Yes it does. Without variance in the organisms genome, that gives variance to the phenotype, there would be nothing for natural selection to select from.
Survival of the fittest would be used to describe this situation.
Its a chicken and egg situation. Adaptation is the response to Natural Selection, and Natural Selection is the response to Adaptation. They both operate by the principle: the members of any species that are best adapted to their environment are the ones most likely to survive and reproduce the next generation, where the process repeats. That does not mean the strongest or most aggressive, they often get themselves killed off.
Fitness is generally measured in average number of fertile offspring.
Adaptation does not allow for natural selection: natural selection causes adaptation.
There are alternate versions of a gene.
natural selection
00ss9q
which is not part of darwins theory of natural selction
Darwins theory of evolution :)
The principle of evolution by means of natural selection.
Survival of the fittest
natural selection
fittest
By giving the theory a mechanism of inheritance. Particulate inheritance, where each parent contributes chromosomes ( Mendel dod not know what a chromosome was and called genes " factors " ) that contain separate alleles that contribute to the progeny's traits. Darwin's idea of " blending " inheritance was completely wrong.
please answer
Also known as Darwins theory of Natural Selection, as in survival of the fittest.