0
What else can I help you with?
How does a scientist critique another scientists conclusions?
By presenting data that contradict those conclusions
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
What do scientist do when a hypothesis is not supported by an experiment?
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
Did thomas Edison work with other scientists?
A. no thomas Edison did not wok with another scientist
Did another scientist work with Thomas Edison?
No, he worked alone like most scientists.
How does a scientist critique another scientists conclusions?
By presenting data that contradict those conclusions
How would a scientist respond to another scientist who questioned her conclusion?
They would basically just answer the question - usually science tests are conducted by different scientists (that is why they share their conclusions).
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
Why do scientists often test the conclusions of another scientist?
Haha but please... the most efficient method on the market is scientific consensus. That gets you the exact answers you want. We don't actually test anything anymore.
What do scientist do when a hypothesis is not supported by an experiment?
Scientists then state another hypothesis and test it out with another experiment.
Did thomas Edison work with other scientists?
A. no thomas Edison did not wok with another scientist
Did another scientist work with Thomas Edison?
No, he worked alone like most scientists.
What is the name of a tsunami Scientists?
A seismologist would be one scientist. Also an oceanographer would be another scientist interested in studying tsunamis.
How do scientists replicate the work of other scientists?
Research results are published in scientific journals. If some scientist wishes to replicate the work of another scientist, he or she reads about it in the published report, and then does what the written description says.
Why is it important that a scientist's result's are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
Why is it important that scientists' result are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
What is another word for find fault?
Critique
