Observation is different from imagination. This is because observation is something that happens in real life while imagination is in your mind.
There are slight differences between the terms inspection and observation. Inspection is when a person takes a very close look at the details of something or someone. An observation is an opinion that is done from a distance.
A scientific observation is simply what someone has seen but does not (by itself) say anything more. Scientific observations are used to formulate theories and these theories you might call "provisional facts". So, a theory is like a fact that can be overturned by a new observation and causes a newer and better theory to be formulated. After lots of observation the "provisional facts" become clearer and clearer and we get closer to "truth". A scientist's opinion (on a scientific subject) is based on the current theory which in turn is supported by all the observations that have ever been made. A person's opinion is not an observation. It is a conclusion based on what that person believes. Some opinions can not be proven to be wrong (or right). Different people can have different opinions based on the same observations. So, an opinion can only be shown to be wrong if there is evidence to show it is wrong - and a scientific observation is an example of how this can be done. To understand this some more, compare the scientific theory of evolution with creationist views about evolution. Both use the same observations and they disagree. Scientists use all existing observations to formulate theories and the latest and best theory is used to form their opinions because it is the one that accounts for all existing observations successfully. However, creationists start with an opinion about how evolution happened based on the Bible, then selectively ignore observations that conflict with their opinion.
Observation and self-reports can be used in things that allow the insertion of an opinion. An example where both would be used is during a psychological evaluation.
A qualitative observation merely indicates that the subject possesses a certain quality, for example "this water is salty". A quantitative observation takes a measurement of the quality, for example "this salty water has a concentration of 10% salt".
Research is about observation, not opinion.
An opinion is what some people think and some people don't agree with what they think and an observation is what you see, hear,taste. A observation can be senses. Save
Observation is different from imagination. This is because observation is something that happens in real life while imagination is in your mind.
Observation is stating a given fact that has nothing to do with your opinion. In contrast to that an inference is when you make an assumptions based on your INTERPRETATION of a fact.
The different methods of observation include naturalistic observation, structured observation, participant observation, and controlled observation. Naturalistic observation involves observing subjects in their natural environment without interference. Structured observation involves creating specific conditions for observation. Participant observation involves the researcher actively participating in the environment being observed. Controlled observation involves manipulating and controlling variables during the observation process.
There are slight differences between the terms inspection and observation. Inspection is when a person takes a very close look at the details of something or someone. An observation is an opinion that is done from a distance.
A scientific observation is simply what someone has seen but does not (by itself) say anything more. Scientific observations are used to formulate theories and these theories you might call "provisional facts". So, a theory is like a fact that can be overturned by a new observation and causes a newer and better theory to be formulated. After lots of observation the "provisional facts" become clearer and clearer and we get closer to "truth". A scientist's opinion (on a scientific subject) is based on the current theory which in turn is supported by all the observations that have ever been made. A person's opinion is not an observation. It is a conclusion based on what that person believes. Some opinions can not be proven to be wrong (or right). Different people can have different opinions based on the same observations. So, an opinion can only be shown to be wrong if there is evidence to show it is wrong - and a scientific observation is an example of how this can be done. To understand this some more, compare the scientific theory of evolution with creationist views about evolution. Both use the same observations and they disagree. Scientists use all existing observations to formulate theories and the latest and best theory is used to form their opinions because it is the one that accounts for all existing observations successfully. However, creationists start with an opinion about how evolution happened based on the Bible, then selectively ignore observations that conflict with their opinion.
That appears to be a wise observation in my opinion.
Observation and self-reports can be used in things that allow the insertion of an opinion. An example where both would be used is during a psychological evaluation.
Observation and self-reports can be used in things that allow the insertion of an opinion. An example where both would be used is during a psychological evaluation.
Observation and self-reports can be used in things that allow the insertion of an opinion. An example where both would be used is during a psychological evaluation.
A remark or observation is a brief comment or statement made about something that has been noticed or noted. It can be an opinion, an insight, or a point made during a conversation or discussion.