0
An observation based on opinion is a subjective interpretation or assessment of a situation, event, or object, shaped by personal beliefs, feelings, and biases rather than objective evidence. Unlike factual observations, which rely on measurable data and verifiable details, opinion-based observations can vary significantly from person to person. This type of observation often reflects individual perspectives and can influence discussions or decision-making, though it may lack the rigor of empirical analysis.
What else can I help you with?
How is an observation different from opinion?
An observation is a factual statement based on direct evidence or sensory experiences, while an opinion reflects personal beliefs or interpretations that may not be universally agreed upon. Observations are objective and verifiable, such as noting the temperature outside, whereas opinions are subjective and can vary from person to person. For example, saying "The sky is blue" is an observation, while stating "Blue is the most beautiful color" is an opinion.
Is an empirical evidence the same as a qualitative observation?
No, empirical evidence is based on observation and inference. Qualitative observation is an observation of the qualities of an object. Quantitative observation, on the other hand, is an observation based on some sort of numerical measurement of the object.
Hypothesis it is a--------- based on observation and the knoledge of the topic.?
An hypothesis is a theory based on observation and the knowledge of the topic.
How is scientific observation different from a persons opinion?
A scientific observation is simply what someone has seen but does not (by itself) say anything more. Scientific observations are used to formulate theories and these theories you might call "provisional facts". So, a theory is like a fact that can be overturned by a new observation and causes a newer and better theory to be formulated. After lots of observation the "provisional facts" become clearer and clearer and we get closer to "truth". A scientist's opinion (on a scientific subject) is based on the current theory which in turn is supported by all the observations that have ever been made. A person's opinion is not an observation. It is a conclusion based on what that person believes. Some opinions can not be proven to be wrong (or right). Different people can have different opinions based on the same observations. So, an opinion can only be shown to be wrong if there is evidence to show it is wrong - and a scientific observation is an example of how this can be done. To understand this some more, compare the scientific theory of evolution with creationist views about evolution. Both use the same observations and they disagree. Scientists use all existing observations to formulate theories and the latest and best theory is used to form their opinions because it is the one that accounts for all existing observations successfully. However, creationists start with an opinion about how evolution happened based on the Bible, then selectively ignore observations that conflict with their opinion.
Why do scientists generates opinions based on evidence?
the role of the opinion might be the "hypothesis" of the observation or data it can also be the thought of the scientist as said the opinion. HAVE FUN IN SCIENCE CLASS!!!
What is inference and observation?
Observation is stating a given fact that has nothing to do with your opinion. In contrast to that an inference is when you make an assumptions based on your INTERPRETATION of a fact.
Is Research is all about opinion?
Research is about observation, not opinion.
What is the difference between observation and opinion?
An opinion is what some people think and some people don't agree with what they think and an observation is what you see, hear,taste. A observation can be senses. Save
How is an observation different from opinion?
An observation is a factual statement based on direct evidence or sensory experiences, while an opinion reflects personal beliefs or interpretations that may not be universally agreed upon. Observations are objective and verifiable, such as noting the temperature outside, whereas opinions are subjective and can vary from person to person. For example, saying "The sky is blue" is an observation, while stating "Blue is the most beautiful color" is an opinion.
The old farm used up everything in the soil. Is it an evidence or opinion?
This would be an opinion, because it is merely a statement expressed based on observation by a bystander, not actual evidence that to verify if this statement is true or not.
What is an observation or remark?
An observation is a statement based on something that is seen, heard, or noticed. A remark is a spoken or written comment or opinion about something. Both observations and remarks are typically used to describe or comment on a situation or experience.
Is an empirical evidence the same as a qualitative observation?
No, empirical evidence is based on observation and inference. Qualitative observation is an observation of the qualities of an object. Quantitative observation, on the other hand, is an observation based on some sort of numerical measurement of the object.
Hypothesis it is a--------- based on observation and the knoledge of the topic.?
An hypothesis is a theory based on observation and the knowledge of the topic.
What is the definition for subjective observation?
Subjective observation refers to personal viewpoints or interpretations based on one's own feelings, opinions, or experiences. It can be influenced by individual biases, emotions, or perspectives, leading to a less objective assessment of a situation or event.
How is scientific observation different from a persons opinion?
A scientific observation is simply what someone has seen but does not (by itself) say anything more. Scientific observations are used to formulate theories and these theories you might call "provisional facts". So, a theory is like a fact that can be overturned by a new observation and causes a newer and better theory to be formulated. After lots of observation the "provisional facts" become clearer and clearer and we get closer to "truth". A scientist's opinion (on a scientific subject) is based on the current theory which in turn is supported by all the observations that have ever been made. A person's opinion is not an observation. It is a conclusion based on what that person believes. Some opinions can not be proven to be wrong (or right). Different people can have different opinions based on the same observations. So, an opinion can only be shown to be wrong if there is evidence to show it is wrong - and a scientific observation is an example of how this can be done. To understand this some more, compare the scientific theory of evolution with creationist views about evolution. Both use the same observations and they disagree. Scientists use all existing observations to formulate theories and the latest and best theory is used to form their opinions because it is the one that accounts for all existing observations successfully. However, creationists start with an opinion about how evolution happened based on the Bible, then selectively ignore observations that conflict with their opinion.
If everyone in the whole world thinks that cats are cute is it an opinion?
Yes, it would still be an opinion as it is a personal belief or judgment that is based on emotion instead of fact. A high number of people sharing the same opinion doesn't make it a fact. A fact refers to verified information made from experience or observation. Opinion is very much subjective, whereas facts are objective.
Why do scientists generates opinions based on evidence?
the role of the opinion might be the "hypothesis" of the observation or data it can also be the thought of the scientist as said the opinion. HAVE FUN IN SCIENCE CLASS!!!
