Yes
The only way to minimize random error is to repeat the experiment more times to get a better average. This means your result is accurate but not percise
experimental, mechanical, and human
A source of error in an experiment refers to any factor that can lead to inaccuracies in the results or measurements. This can include systematic errors, such as calibration issues with instruments, or random errors, such as variations in measurements due to environmental factors. Human error, such as misreading instruments or incorrect data recording, is also a common source of error. Identifying and minimizing these errors is crucial for improving the reliability and validity of experimental outcomes.
Cybernetic controls include Routine Expert Trial-and-error Learning takes place here through feedback and feedforward Non-cybernetic controls include Intuition Judgement Power and politics Learning does not take place as objectives are ambiguous, outputs are not measurable and the effects of intervention are unknown
Basically, so that if one reading is skewed due to human error or other, then there will be other readings to compensate.
An error made by a human.
Yes this will make data more accurate. Eliminate human error.
The answer is Accurate
Human error?
Margin of Error
yes it is
mechanical error, design error, human error.
Mechanical stopwatches are generally accurate to within a fraction of a second, depending on the quality and maintenance of the stopwatch. However, they are not as precise as digital stopwatches due to the potential for human error in starting and stopping the timer manually.
Human error.
forms that can be read by computers are now used to eliminate human error when evaluating and calculating data.
There is no difference.There IS a difference. An error is the amount of deviation from a correct or accurate result. A mistake is a misunderstanding of a meaning or intention.
Human Error - 1988 is rated/received certificates of: UK:PG