0
What else can I help you with?
What would happen if we didn't have batteries?
With out batteries some electronic machines , objects etc. do not work . Most of the machines , objects etc. consist and needs batteries (NOTE :- ( I HOPE MY ANSWER IS CORRECT ))
What would happen if if you turned on a light with no bulb?
Nothing would happen.
If two objects have different masses they also would have different?
no
What would happen if there was no industry?
No I want the answer
What would happen if a center does not have limits.?
nothing would had happened.
What would happen if an unstoppable object collided with an immobile object?
the particles would split tocreate multiple unstoppable objects
What would happen if an immovable object got hit by an unstoppable force?
If the unstoppable object was smaller, then it would pierce a hole through the immovable object, not moving the object, and not stopping.
What happens when an immovable object is struck by an unstoppable force?
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
What happens when a unstoppable force meats an immovable object?
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
What do you think would happen to the atmosphere if there was no gravity?
All the objects will float if there will be no gravity. Gravity is the earth's pull on objects.
What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
What happens when an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object?
This scenario presents a logical paradox because if the force is truly unstoppable, then it should be able to move any object regardless of its immovability. However, if the object is truly unmovable, then no force, not even an unstoppable one, should be able to move it. This dilemma illustrates the limitations of our understanding of physics and the concept of infinity.
What would win an unstoppable force or an undestroyable object?
they would both lose.
Is there a question that cannot be answered that doesnt have to do with science?
Basic paradoxes are examples of questions that cannot be answered. For example, what happens when an immovable object meets an unstoppable force? Since neither an immovable object nor an unstoppable force exist in reality, there is no way to determine what would happen in this theoretical situation. Source: personal experience
What would happen if earth rotated more quickly?
The days would be shorter. Objects would be slightly less heavy, but not noticeably.
If Sasuke and Gaara fused like goku and vegeta would they be unstoppable?
yes. they would be EPIC.
What happens when an object that cannot be stopped collides with and object that cannot be moved?
You mean what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object? Well... that is a paradox. In a world where there is an unstoppable force, by definition, there cannot be an immovable object, and vice versa. And let's just say there were such things. When the collide, there will be an infinite transfer of energy. The unstoppable force will have infinite momentum and the immovable object will have infinite inertia. And when they collide, because according to the law of conservation of energy, energy is never created or destroyed, the energy will be constantly exchanged among the two hypothetical objects.
