The most likely outcome of their disagreement is that it will lead to further research and discussions, as each scientist may present evidence supporting their position. This could result in a deeper investigation into the environmental impacts of different grocery bags, potentially leading to more informed conclusions. Additionally, their differing viewpoints might influence public opinion and policy decisions regarding sustainable practices. Ultimately, their disagreement could foster a more nuanced understanding of the complexities involved in environmental sustainability.
they will gather more evidence before reaching a conclusion more studies of issues will be done
so they can picture the outcome or make a mental picture of it.~Hannah .B.
The run the experiments over and over again, looking for anything that may have gone wrong to give them that outcome. They also test variables to see how changing them affects the outcome. Also, research teams that are independent from the original team usually try to verify the outcome to verify the integrity of the experiment.
because they need to observe what they are working on, hypothesize and predict what the outcome will be, and experiment to see if they are correct.
In science, an outcome variable, often referred to as a dependent variable, is the main variable that researchers measure to assess the effects of changes in other variables, typically independent variables. It reflects the results or effects observed in an experiment or study, helping to determine whether a hypothesis is supported. Analyzing outcome variables allows scientists to draw conclusions about relationships and causality within their research.
A. More studies will take place on the issue.
more studies will take place on the issue
A. More studies will take place on the issue. Disagreements between scientists often lead to further research as they seek to gather more data, refine methodologies, and test different hypotheses. This additional research can help clarify the environmental impacts of various grocery bag types and contribute to a more informed consensus.
all the factors in the environment that affects the outcome of the patient's condition
they will gather more evidence before reaching a conclusion more studies of issues will be done
So scientists can know for certain if the factor they're testing affects the outcome and isn't caused by another factor which isn't being measured. It elimiantes the chance of another factor affecting the outcome of an experiment.
Healthy offsprings are produced
Fortune tellers and scientists say that all disasters will happen on 12/12/12.
control the outcome,never give up
Genetic drift is not an outcome of the environment modifying a phenotype. Genetic drift refers to random changes in allele frequencies in a population due to chance events, rather than environmental influences.
Scientists do not have to agree, both can publish their results and see if peer discussion resolves the issue. If, for some reason, one point of view had to win, then much work would be involved.In this question the definition of the word "better" would be central point of initial discussion. Does better mean:strongermore biodegradablecheapercause less waste and pollution during manufacturerequire less energy to makehave a lower carbon footprintbe reusablesell sterilizingtastyThese options would have to be discussed before any reasonable further work would be possible.Then, an agreement would have to be made on:sample sizeanalytic methodsapplicable criteriadata evaluationtesting procedures and analysisacceptable funding sourcesacceptable bag originsacceptable stakeholder inputAfter all this scientific study, the public (users of the bag) might not agree and could just go on using whatever bag they wanted.
so they can picture the outcome or make a mental picture of it.~Hannah .B.