0
Two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. What is the most likely outcome of their disagreement?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Verified answer
they will gather more evidence before reaching a conclusion
more studies of issues will be done
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Dameon Jackson
Parker Braun
more studies will take place on the issue
Fatou Jadama
Napoleon Barton
more studies will take place on the issue
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoScientists do not have to agree, both can publish their results and see if peer discussion resolves the issue. If, for some reason, one point of view had to win, then much work would be involved.
In this question the definition of the word "better" would be central point of initial discussion. Does better mean:
- stronger
- more biodegradable
- cheaper
- cause less waste and pollution during manufacture
- require less energy to make
- have a lower carbon footprint
- be reusable
- sell sterilizing
- tasty
Then, an agreement would have to be made on:
- sample size
- analytic methods
- applicable criteria
- data evaluation
- testing procedures and analysis
- acceptable funding sources
- acceptable bag origins
- acceptable stakeholder input
After all this scientific study, the public (users of the bag) might not agree and could just go on using whatever bag they wanted.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoTwo scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. The outcome would most likely be that more studies will take place on the issue.
rainbowqq
more studies will take place on the issue
rainbowqq
more studies
Jacob Whittecar
d
Anonymous
They will each find new data to try to support their position < apex
Why are the mental pictures that scientists use useful?
so they can picture the outcome or make a mental picture of it.~Hannah .B.
Scientific results must be verified by?
The run the experiments over and over again, looking for anything that may have gone wrong to give them that outcome. They also test variables to see how changing them affects the outcome. Also, research teams that are independent from the original team usually try to verify the outcome to verify the integrity of the experiment.
How do scientists use observations hypotheses predictions and experiments in scientific investigations?
because they need to observe what they are working on, hypothesize and predict what the outcome will be, and experiment to see if they are correct.
What do scientists need to do if they make a mistake and need to retest the experiment?
They need to keep a record of each step, then start the experiment over and try not to make the mistake again or make changes in what they did to see what outcome they get.
True or false Most scientists come up with questions to investigate out of the blue?
One would never know as most scientists are reluctant to specify much as it may impact their grant funding. Scientists often research and investigate items that catch their interest, are within their field of expertize, are available to be easily funded, and could provide an outcome capable of career advancement. of course there are variables according to the particular field, scientist, and depth of involvement, among many possibilities.
two scientist do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. what is most likely outcome of their disagreement?
more studies will take place on the issue
What are the components of therapeutic environment?
all the factors in the environment that affects the outcome of the patient's condition
What is the outcome in an ideal environment for sexual reproduction?
Healthy offsprings are produced
How do scientists make predictions?
Scientists make predictions with a hypothesis. Using their observations, models, and other scientists' work, they create a statement of a possible outcome called a hypothesis. Then scientists design tests to check whether their prediction was true.
Why do scientists find it important to use a control in an experiment?
So scientists can know for certain if the factor they're testing affects the outcome and isn't caused by another factor which isn't being measured. It elimiantes the chance of another factor affecting the outcome of an experiment.
Negative effects of man and his environment?
control the outcome,never give up
What about 2012 outcome?
Fortune tellers and scientists say that all disasters will happen on 12/12/12.
Why are the mental pictures that scientists use useful?
so they can picture the outcome or make a mental picture of it.~Hannah .B.
What if two scientists do not agree on which type of grocery bag is better for the environment. what is the most likely outcome of their disagreement?
Scientists do not have to agree, both can publish their results and see if peer discussion resolves the issue. If, for some reason, one point of view had to win, then much work would be involved.In this question the definition of the word "better" would be central point of initial discussion. Does better mean:strongermore biodegradablecheapercause less waste and pollution during manufacturerequire less energy to makehave a lower carbon footprintbe reusablesell sterilizingtastyThese options would have to be discussed before any reasonable further work would be possible.Then, an agreement would have to be made on:sample sizeanalytic methodsapplicable criteriadata evaluationtesting procedures and analysisacceptable funding sourcesacceptable bag originsacceptable stakeholder inputAfter all this scientific study, the public (users of the bag) might not agree and could just go on using whatever bag they wanted.
What If an organization fails to produce outputs valued in the external environment whiat is likely the outcome?
disintegration
What is the name given to a written decision by Supreme Court Justices that while they agree with the final outcome of the case they do not agree with the reasoning behind the final outcome?
It is a concurring opinion. If there is no disagreement with the basis, the justice is included in the "majority opinion." In some cases, concurring opinions can become plurality decisions.
What are the components and importance of economic environment?
The components of economic environment include economic conditions, economic systems, economic policies, international economic environment, and economic legislation. Each of these components rely on each other and decide the outcome of the environment.
