0
What else can I help you with?
In any good experiment scientist needs to blank the hyothesis?
test
In any good experiment the scientist needs to blank the hypothesis?
conclusion
What variable should the scientist control in the experiment?
The scientist should control the independent variable, which is the factor that is manipulated in the experiment to observe its effect on the dependent variable. By keeping the independent variable constant, the scientist can ensure that any changes in the dependent variable are due to the manipulation and not other factors. Additionally, controlling extraneous variables is also important to minimize their influence on the results.
Why is it important for a scientist to have good observational skills?
because scientist cant observe well if they didnt have any good observation skills
How many times should a scientist conduct the same experiment?
A scientist should conduct the same experiment multiple times to ensure the results are reliable and reproducible. Typically, repeating an experiment at least three times is recommended to account for variability and to establish statistical significance. This practice helps identify any anomalies and strengthens the validity of the findings. Ultimately, the number of repetitions may vary depending on the complexity of the experiment and the precision required.
In any good experiment scientist needs to blank the hyothesis?
test
In any good experiment the scientist needs to blank the hypothesis?
conclusion
Is any Scientist feels bad when another Scientist gives the drawbacks of his Experiment or theory?
yes
How doe a specimen collection help a scientist do an experiment?
The collection of a specimen is helpful for any scientist doing an experiment as it will provide them with an organism that they can use to conduct various tests and calculations on.
If a scientist performs an experiment does he have any idea of the outcome?
Your hypothesis is the guess you make as to what will happen. A scientist has that idea in mind when he or she makes the experiment to test that hypothesis. They may be right or they may be wrong, but they always have an idea of what's going to happen because that's why they do the experiment in the first place.
HOW DOES A scientist helps a colleague do a better experiment by?
A scientist can help a colleague do a better experiment by offering guidance on experimental design, providing feedback on methodology, and suggesting ways to improve data analysis and interpretation. Additionally, they can share their expertise and experience to troubleshoot any issues that may arise during the experiment.
Does your science experiment have to have a control?
Yes, any science experiment needs a control, or else you don't have a baseline from which to base your understanding of the rest of your data.
How does a scientist help a colleague do better on a experiment?
A scientist can help a colleague do better on an experiment by providing guidance on experimental design, offering feedback on methodology, sharing resources or expertise, and engaging in discussions to troubleshoot any issues that may arise during the experiment. Collaboration and open communication are key in supporting a colleague to improve their experimental outcomes.
In any good experiment the scientists need to what the hypothesis?
Test
What is the step that you use during an experiment?
Any basic experiment has a control and a variable. The control remains unchanged with no experiments. It is left to exist in it's normal state. The variable is the test subject. This is what you use when you experiment. Once you have both a control and a variable, you keep a daily log or journal to monitor any progress or failure. Good journals/logs are kept from start to finish and explain every detail of the experiment from start to finish. A good scientist also writes a post log to record any ideas they may want to remember for future use or experimentation. (i.e. What I would do different next time)
What is the step you used during an experiment?
Any basic experiment has a control and a variable. The control remains unchanged with no experiments. It is left to exist in it's normal state. The variable is the test subject. This is what you use when you experiment. Once you have both a control and a variable, you keep a daily log or journal to monitor any progress or failure. Good journals/logs are kept from start to finish and explain every detail of the experiment from start to finish. A good scientist also writes a post log to record any ideas they may want to remember for future use or experimentation. (i.e. What I would do different next time)
A scientist is planning an experiment on the effect of the heat on the function of a certain enzyme Which would not be appropiate first step?
Starting the experiment without clearly defining the research question and objectives would not be an appropriate first step. It's crucial to have a clear understanding of what you want to investigate and achieve before conducting any experiment.
