answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning is when researchers work from general information to more specific information. Inductive reasoning is when researchers work from specific observations to theories and generalizations.


How are deductive and inductive reasoning diffrent from another?

Deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Deductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion with certainty, while inductive reasoning aims to support a conclusion with probability.


How is inductive reasoning weaker than deductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it involves making generalizations based on specific observations, which can lead to errors or false conclusions. In contrast, deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and uses it to make specific predictions or draw specific conclusions, which can be more reliable and conclusive when executed correctly.


When general conclusions are drawn from specific observations what type of reasoning is used?

inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.


What are the two types of reasoning?

The two types are deductive and inductive. Deduction centrally involves what is supposed to be demonstrative evidence, and induction centrally involves what is supposed to be nondemonstrative evidence.


What type of reasoning is used when a scientist tests a hypothesis?

A scientist uses inductive reasoning when testing a hypothesis. This involves making generalizations based on specific observations or data. By testing the hypothesis through experiments or observations, the scientist can gather evidence to support or refute the hypothesis.


Which type of reasoning is usually based on laws rules principles generalizations or definitions?

Deductive reasoning is usually based on laws, rules, principles, generalizations, or definitions. It involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises.


Inductive reasoning moves from to .?

specific to general


How do inductie and deductive reasoning apply to forming a hypothesis?

Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on observations, leading to the formation of a hypothesis. Deductive reasoning involves starting with a general hypothesis and making specific predictions that can be tested. Both types of reasoning are important in forming and testing hypotheses in scientific research.


Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.


A syllogism is a type of that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?

deductive reasoning


What is using general observations to draw specific conclusion known as?

Deductive reasoning