answersLogoWhite

0

No. Evolution is not valid. Evolution suggests that one species changes into another species. Given all that we know about DNA, there is no possible way for any one species to change into another species even with mutations. Mutations make the individual organism weaker than the average organism of the species population and in many cases causes that organism to be sterile. Even if the individual organism does reproduce, the weak trait will be covered by the dominant allele thus rendering the mutation dormant. There would need to be a simultaneous catastrophic production of the mutation on a mass scale within the population for the mutation to even show up on a large scale in the population. Even if this magically occurred, there would not be a new species, only a new trait that shows up in the species. There is not a single documented case of any species changing into a new species.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What does the theory of evolution believe?

Evolution believes nothing. It assumes a couple of things, e.g. that life existed previously to any evolution occurring and that laws of physics and chemistry have been constant, etc.However, beyond these assumptions - which are valid - the theory of evolution relies on evidence and facts, and a lot of it.


Could Noriko's Pabumon eventually become BlackGabumon?

Her partner is a Punimon, not a Pabumon. An evolution to BlackGabumon is a valid possibility, though.


Which idea did lamarck propose that was rejected by his fellow scientists?

That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.


How can micro evolution happen?

By simple genetic recombination for one. microevolution is just evolution and evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms. Just change over time short of speciation and especially valid for sexually reproducing organisms who always change allele frequencies through coitus and reproduction.


Is the fossil record valid evidence for evolution?

Yes, the fossil record is considered a valid and significant piece of evidence for evolution. Fossils provide a record of past life forms and show a progression of species over time, supporting the idea that organisms have changed and diversified through evolutionary processes. Additionally, the discovery of transitional fossils helps to fill in gaps and provide connections between different groups of organisms.


Was lamarck's theory accepted or rejected?

His theory of use and disuse was rejected.


Theory in a sentence?

Darwin's theory of evolution is a valid yet unproven theory.


Which idea did Lamarck propose that was rejected by fellow scientist?

That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.


How do you spell valid?

You are right with valid


What makes a Texas property sale valid?

Transfer by a valid deed.Transfer by a valid deed.Transfer by a valid deed.Transfer by a valid deed.


For what reason is evolution false?

There is no such reason. Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is a fact and as much a fact as the sun rising in the East every day. The theory of evolution explains much about the fact of evolution and is supported by more evidence that the fact that the sun seems to rise in the East is explained by the theory of heliocenterism.


What is a macro evolution?

Micro-evolution is not only a part of macro-evolution, it is the same mechanism as macro-evolution. Macro-evolution includes speciation, as a result of continuing micro-evolution.