Fossils provide amazing evidence for the theory of evolution and the long history of life on Earth.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
Depends on whether all the theory is being contradicted or only a part of theory faces contradiction. For instance; the theory of evolution by natural selection would take a theory shaking hit if we found fossil rabbits in the Cambrian period, which has not happened. Only part of the theory of evolution by natural selection was contradicted by Mendelian genetics, when Mendel's much better heritability mechanism replaced Darwin's idea about blending inheritance. The theory only got stronger by this ratification.If that new evidence is solid enough, it may require a revision of the theory. If it is just shaky and occurs because of some error in the experiment, it is usually discarded as uncredible.
Valid and sound arguments are essential for logical reasoning and critical thinking. Validity ensures the logical structure of an argument is consistent, while soundness additionally requires that the premises are true. Evidence helps establish the truth of premises, increasing the credibility and strength of an argument. Without evidence, arguments may lack support and fail to persuade others.
Facts are pieces of information that can be proven true or valid, while figures and other evidence gathered through observation are known as data or empirical evidence. These data points help support or refute various claims or hypotheses.
Distinguishing between valid and faulty generalizations helps ensure that conclusions drawn from specific instances are accurate and reliable. Valid generalizations are based on sound reasoning and evidence, while faulty ones can lead to misinformation and unfair judgments. By being able to identify the difference, we can make better decisions and avoid stereotyping or making misleading assumptions.
true Answer The Theory of Evolution by Means of Natural Selection is accepted by most, almost all, scientists as an excellent account of how life must change and diversify and adapt across time. Evolution is considered factual and thus true by most scientists. The reason for this is the huge amount of evidence, which comes from comparative genetics, comparative genomics, comparative cytogenetics, biogeography, comparative morphology, comparative biochemistry, comparative behaviour and the fossil record.
Evolution believes nothing. It assumes a couple of things, e.g. that life existed previously to any evolution occurring and that laws of physics and chemistry have been constant, etc.However, beyond these assumptions - which are valid - the theory of evolution relies on evidence and facts, and a lot of it.
Yes, theorems - once they have been proved - are valid evidence.
Evolution is most certainly not a religion. It is a valid scientific theory with a large body of evidence to support it. Religion is defined by dictionary.com as: "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs." Evolution does not concern itself with the cause, nature, or purpose of the universe. Nor does it involve devotional and ritual observances, or contain a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. The theory of evolution is an explanation of how life forms change over time and why life on Earth is so diverse. It is supported by large amounts of empirical evidence found in anatomy, genetics, embryology, and the fossil record. It is accepted by both the religious and non-religious alike.
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
The valid form of evidence in deductive reasoning helps you come with an informed decision based on the evidence presented.
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
For any hypothesis to be considered a theory, a scientific journal must be written and submitted to undergo rigorous peer evaluation. The theory of evolution has sufficient evidence and support to withstand the dissection from biologists around the world. However, keep in mind that the theory of evolution is not "proven" as nothing in the realm of science can be confirmed with absolute certainty. Evolution is widely accepted among the scientifically literate. It is broadly rejected among those who hold religious objections. The theory has enjoyed tremendous success over the years, and is now considered to be the foundational theory of biology. Theodosius Dobzhansky once said, "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." I would consider that a pretty strong validation.
You will need a valid driver's license for identification.
The claim that can be asserted without evidence requires evidence to be considered valid.
Evidence valid means that the cps investigator believes that the charge or report he/she is investigating is true or there is enough proof to substantiate the claim.