That is a very good question...there are 7 things that can prove wheather it is a living or a non-living things (note- the object or thing does not have to have all of theese charectoristics)
-it grows
-exchange of gasses
-has cells (DNA)
-needs nutrients
-produces waste
-reproduces
-needs water
as you can see fire does not have all of theese but it does have a couple it grows when you throw wood in it, it produces waste (ash) it needs nutrient like an obvious one ( oxygen) but on the other hand it definitly DOESNT need water it doesnt really exchange in gasses, but in the end it could be proven that fire is non-living, which means it never had/was been alive.
It can't because it is NOT a living organism.
nonliving
Non-living
All are made from matter.
both the living and nonliving components of the biosphere.
fire is a nonliving thing because it does not show all the characteristics of a living thing....
Fire is considered a nonliving thing because it does not have cells, reproduce, grow, or respond to stimuli like living organisms do. Fire is a chemical reaction that occurs when a fuel source combines with oxygen and reaches a high enough temperature to ignite.
Any and all heat, like flame, is nonliving. A forest fire is flame and is therefore nonliving.
It can't because it is NOT a living organism.
the earth is nonliving but has living organisms on it
nonliving
it is nonliving
nonliving
nonliving
It is obviously nonliving because fires can't just come alive there has to be something that can make a fire happen.______________________By the above analysis, people are nonliving as well. I think fires are nonliving because they do not reproduce genetically. And unlike any living things they cancome about spontaneously, where there is no fire that kindles them. All they need is the right kind of material, oxygen and a high enough heat.
nonliving...
Iancelet is nonliving.