0
What else can I help you with?
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why should scientists perform experiments apex?
To answer specific questions
Should scientists repeat experiments to see if their data is reproducible?
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions. The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions.... Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
Why should scientists repeat their experiments?
They repeat them in order to try and see if it will fail. They may add or remove different variables depending on the results to see if something is effecting the experiment correctly or falsely. Start with a hypothesis and then test it and when you feel you are finished test it thats when the real testing begins.
Scientists should not repeat their experiment to see if their data is reproducible?
No they shoudnt have.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Why should scientists perform experiments apex?
To answer specific questions
What should a scientist do after done withe experiments?
they should observe it and pass it on to other scientists
How is a scientific hypothesis best evaluated?
A scientific hypothesis is best evaluated through the scientific method, which involves making observations, formulating a hypothesis, designing and conducting experiments, analyzing the data, and drawing conclusions. The hypothesis should be testable, falsifiable, and reproducible to be considered valid. Peer review and replication of experiments by other scientists are also important for evaluating the validity of a hypothesis.
Should scientists repeat experiments to see if their data is reproducible?
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions. The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions.... Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
Why should scientists repeat their experiments?
They repeat them in order to try and see if it will fail. They may add or remove different variables depending on the results to see if something is effecting the experiment correctly or falsely. Start with a hypothesis and then test it and when you feel you are finished test it thats when the real testing begins.
Who first asserted that scientists should conduct narrow experiments to answer questions?
Francis Bacon
