0
Scientists make more mistakes than not. It is part of the business and why they call their work "experiments". As a working scientists you try to keep your basics constant. You control the pH of your solutions, the don't switch suppliers for even basic salts mid-experiment. Most importantly you repeat experiments several times and use statistical analysis to support your conclusions.
The goal of scientist is to have his/her results confirmed by repetition by others. If it isn't reproducible than it isn't believable. But wrong conclusions....
Record your mistake in the results and talk about it in the conclusion/examination of data.
What else can I help you with?
Is it true scientists should not repeat experiments to see if thir data is reproducible?
no. experiments should be repeatd
Why do scientists repeat experiments?
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. The experiment must be repeated for the scientist to develop a theory. One experiment does not prove your hypothesis correct; therefore, it must be done a several times.
Why do scientists repeat other researchers experiment?
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
Should scientist repeat experiments to compare results?
Yes, scientists should repeat experiments to compare results, as this helps ensure the reliability and validity of findings. Replication allows researchers to identify any inconsistencies, control for variables, and confirm that results are not due to chance or experimental error. Additionally, repeated experiments can enhance the robustness of scientific claims and contribute to the overall credibility of the research.
If you repeat your experiment and get similar results what is your experiment called?
If you repeat your experiment and obtain similar results, your experiment is referred to as being "reliable" or demonstrating "reliability." This consistency in results suggests that your findings are reproducible and not due to random chance. Such experiments contribute to the credibility of the scientific conclusions drawn from them.
Is it true scientists should not repeat experiments to see if thir data is reproducible?
no. experiments should be repeatd
Scientists should not repeat their experiment to see if their data is reproducible?
No they shoudnt have.
Why should scientist repeat quantitative experiments?
Scientists should repeat quantitative experiments to ensure the reliability and validity of their results. Repetition helps identify any anomalies or errors, allowing researchers to confirm that their findings are consistent and reproducible. Additionally, repeating experiments can help establish statistical significance, providing greater confidence in the conclusions drawn from the data. Ultimately, this practice enhances the overall integrity of scientific research.
Why might a scientists repeat an experiment?
Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.
Why do scientist do experiments over?
Scientists repeat experiments to test whether results are consistent and reliable.
Why do scientists repeat experiments?
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. The experiment must be repeated for the scientist to develop a theory. One experiment does not prove your hypothesis correct; therefore, it must be done a several times.
Why might scientist repeat an experiment?
Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.
Why do scientists repeat other researchers experiment?
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
What is the term used for scientists repeating their experiments in order to reduce error chance?
Repeat testing
Why do scientists repeat?
Scientists repeat experiments for reliability. The experiment must be repeated for the scientist to develop a theory. One experiment does not prove your hypothesis correct; therefore, it must be done a several times.
Should scientist repeat experiments to compare results?
Yes, scientists should repeat experiments to compare results, as this helps ensure the reliability and validity of findings. Replication allows researchers to identify any inconsistencies, control for variables, and confirm that results are not due to chance or experimental error. Additionally, repeated experiments can enhance the robustness of scientific claims and contribute to the overall credibility of the research.
Why do scientists do experiments more than once?
Oh, dude, scientists do experiments more than once because they want to make sure their results aren't just a fluke. Like, imagine if they discovered a cure for something, but it only worked once out of a hundred tries - that would be a bummer. So, they repeat experiments to make sure their findings are legit and not just a one-time lucky shot.
