0
What else can I help you with?
How are theory laws hypothesis connected?
A scientific theory and a scientific law are similar in that they both propose to describe and predict the behavior of some aspect of nature in terms of a few basic princples. The main difference is that a scientific theory does not yet have enough evidence to verify its validity. A scientific theory becomes a scientific law after enough evidence has been collected, through experimentation, to be reasonably sure that its description of how nature behaves will always be correct. It often takes as long as a hundred years of experiments before a theory is accepted as a law.
Which one of these is always part of using th scientific method?
The scientific method always involves making observations, formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and analyzing the results to draw conclusions. This systematic approach helps ensure that findings are based on empirical evidence and can be replicated by others. Additionally, it often includes revising the hypothesis based on experimental results, leading to further testing and refinement of ideas.
What is about observation is always part of scientific method?
Observation is a fundamental component of the scientific method because it provides the empirical evidence needed to formulate hypotheses and test theories. Through careful observation, scientists gather data about natural phenomena, which helps them identify patterns and relationships. This process allows for the development of testable predictions and contributes to the iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where observations can lead to new questions and refinements of existing knowledge.
What are scientific law characteristics?
Scientific laws are concise statements that describe consistent and universal relationships observed in nature, often expressed mathematically. They are based on repeated experimental observations and can predict outcomes under specific conditions. Unlike theories, which provide explanations for phenomena, laws summarize patterns and behaviors that hold true across various scenarios. Importantly, scientific laws are always subject to revision or refinement as new evidence emerges.
Could a scientific knowledge be changed or modified?
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
True or False Empirical evidence always trumps theory. Give a reason for your answer.?
If your issues are on the table, then it would be apparent that empirical evidence would trump theory, if the theory on the table were not proven to be true. If the theory were proven to be true, and the empirical evidence does not agree with the theory, then more experimentation would be necessary to determine the validity of the theory.
A supposition that some mix of common sense and scientific inquiry will always lead to a conclusion that is true typifies what?
This belief aligns with the principle of methodological naturalism, which asserts that the scientific method, guided by reason and empirical evidence, can provide reliable knowledge about the natural world. It contrasts with supernatural explanations and pseudoscience, emphasizing the importance of testable hypotheses and critical thinking in reaching conclusions that are supported by evidence.
How are theory laws hypothesis connected?
A scientific theory and a scientific law are similar in that they both propose to describe and predict the behavior of some aspect of nature in terms of a few basic princples. The main difference is that a scientific theory does not yet have enough evidence to verify its validity. A scientific theory becomes a scientific law after enough evidence has been collected, through experimentation, to be reasonably sure that its description of how nature behaves will always be correct. It often takes as long as a hundred years of experiments before a theory is accepted as a law.
Should economics be considered a science?
Microeconomics should be considered a science because it has a solid foundation of empirical evidence. Macroeconomics is less precise with weaker empirical evidence. Some people compares macroeconomics to astrology because experts in both fields sometimes ,but far from always, makes correct predictions of the future.
Which one of these is always part of using th scientific method?
The scientific method always involves making observations, formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments to test that hypothesis, and analyzing the results to draw conclusions. This systematic approach helps ensure that findings are based on empirical evidence and can be replicated by others. Additionally, it often includes revising the hypothesis based on experimental results, leading to further testing and refinement of ideas.
What is about observation is always part of scientific method?
Observation is a fundamental component of the scientific method because it provides the empirical evidence needed to formulate hypotheses and test theories. Through careful observation, scientists gather data about natural phenomena, which helps them identify patterns and relationships. This process allows for the development of testable predictions and contributes to the iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where observations can lead to new questions and refinements of existing knowledge.
What are scientific law characteristics?
Scientific laws are concise statements that describe consistent and universal relationships observed in nature, often expressed mathematically. They are based on repeated experimental observations and can predict outcomes under specific conditions. Unlike theories, which provide explanations for phenomena, laws summarize patterns and behaviors that hold true across various scenarios. Importantly, scientific laws are always subject to revision or refinement as new evidence emerges.
Could a scientific knowledge be changed or modified?
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
What is the is the attitude of scientific-minded person?
The attitude of scientific- minded persons is always rational and based on facts not on myths and assumptions and presumptions.Their attitude life and things is objective and unbiased.This type of attitude leads to the discovery of truth.
What is true about scientific debates A always resolve the problem B scientists work out different views C scientific evidence is not used D everyone must agree?
Scientific debates let scientists work out different views. Debates present differing ideas and views with that scientist's "scientific evidence", but scientists do not always agree and cannot always resolve the problem(s). Debates are like a think tank. They generate more ideas than declaring one solution or answer.
What is the refute theory of natural inspiration?
anything that is false it isn't the truth whole truth nothing but the truth it is proven wrong here is the meaning of the word refute ....http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/refute Best of luck my friend godbless.
Does empirical rules always apply to discrete probability distribution?
the empirical rules of probablility applies to the continuous probability distribution
