There is currently no scientific evidence to support the existence of real "Ghosts".
However, if you are looking for an explanation that is not supernatural, there are many reasons why people "see" ghosts - vibrations of the retina can cause shapes to form before the eyes, often caused by extractor fans or generators. electromagnetic fields effect upon the human brain, temperature changes, lighting - even tectonic movements. If you are a rational person, I am sure you will agree that if ghosts (the spirit of the dead version) existed, we would be knee deep in them, considering how many people have lived and died. It also raises the question of the human "superiority complex" - life has existed on the earth for millions of years, humans, in their current form for a mere 4 million years - what quality do we have that allows us to live on past death? its ideas like this that quickly kill the idea of ghosts and the afterlife - its just wishful thinking, and our overwhelming fear of death and the unknown.
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
No
Ancedotally normally refers to evidence that is based on less scientific evidence but evidence that appears to back up the stronger scientific evidence. It adds weight to scientific evidence but is not necessarily proven.
when the evidence is relatable
If it weren't, then it wouldn't be scientific.
There is no scientific evidence. Those who believe in ghosts will put forward non-scientific evidence.
Some people believe that ghosts are real. There does not seem to be any real scientific evidence or proof of the existence of ghosts, but there is also no evidence that they do not exist.
No, there is no scientific evidence that directly proves that ghosts exist. It is just folklore.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so there is no scientific name for them. Ghosts are often considered to be a paranormal or supernatural phenomenon that is not recognized by the scientific community.
There is currently no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts. The phenomenon of ghosts falls under the realm of the supernatural, which is beyond the scope of scientific explanation as it cannot be tested or observed through empirical methods.
There is no scientific evidence proving that ghosts exist.
No, definite scientific evidence has never been published nor has any definite evidence to the contrary been produced.
It depends on if you have the gift to see ghosts.
There are many ghosts at the howard school
Although there is an enormous amount of anecdotal evidence in the form of people who claim to have seen ghosts, and to have spoken to ghosts, to have been haunted by ghosts etc., there isn't any solid scientific evidence that ghosts exist. Most scientists would consider that the idea of ghosts is not plausible because there is no apparent mechanism that would produce them. No matter how closely the human body and its various functions have been examined, no scientist has yet detected ectoplasm or any other spiritual essence. This does not in itself prove that no such material will ever be discovered, but until it is, there is little scientific reason to believe in ghosts.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts, so it is not possible to determine if they have feelings. Belief in ghosts is largely based on personal beliefs and cultural perspectives.
Applying the scientific method, it is unverifiable, but evidence points to "no". Ghosts are about as likely to exist as the tooth fairy, Santa, or God.