The most widely accepted answer to this question is no, there is no scientific evidence that angels exist. There are some who believe that seeing science cannot disprove angels exist either, the evidence is inconclusive. This is known as the burden of proof.
Hi, data provides evidence to back up your claim. Without evidence, your claim is not reliable.
A scientific claim is, basically, a prediction of an experiment's outcome.
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
To refute a claim with a counterclaim, you must support your argument with evidence to ensure the validity of your claims.
scientist deals with the physicals world so all claim are subject to indepent experimentalverification and peer review for agreement with the established body of evidence
Hi, data provides evidence to back up your claim. Without evidence, your claim is not reliable.
Is the evidence from the best source I can find
wwe
Fjh
A scientific claim is, basically, a prediction of an experiment's outcome.
Does this evidence support what I am trying to say
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
Does this evidence relate to what I am saying
explain how your evidence supports your claim
Evidence together with argument as to how the evidence makes the claim (the proposition that someone is claiming to be true) more credible.
New scientific evidence supports the claim about curfews