No; it is not testable.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Statistically the results will not be scientifically valid if the sample size is too small.
The components of a scientific investigation typically include a research question, a hypothesis, a method for conducting the experiment, data collection, and analysis. Additionally, scientists often include controls and variables to ensure the experiment is valid and reliable. Finally, conclusions are drawn based on the data, and results are communicated through reports or presentations.
The average person forms theories with little if any intellectual rigor or scientific investigation, hence, those theories are often not valid.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Saying a scientific question must be supportable means it must be answerable through evidence-based methods and data. It implies that the question should be structured in a way that allows for investigation and testing to reach a valid conclusion.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Bias in a scientific investigation usually comes in the form of wanting a particular result. This can skew with the process, doing things that an objective experiment would never do, such as only choose certain results as valid.
Statistically the results will not be scientifically valid if the sample size is too small.
The components of a scientific investigation typically include a research question, a hypothesis, a method for conducting the experiment, data collection, and analysis. Additionally, scientists often include controls and variables to ensure the experiment is valid and reliable. Finally, conclusions are drawn based on the data, and results are communicated through reports or presentations.
The average person forms theories with little if any intellectual rigor or scientific investigation, hence, those theories are often not valid.
The question "Do plants enjoy it when people sing to them?" is not a valid scientific question because it anthropomorphizes plants by attributing human emotions like enjoyment. Scientific inquiry requires measurable and objective criteria, and while studies have explored the effects of sound on plant growth, enjoyment is a subjective experience that cannot be accurately assessed in plants. Research could focus on whether certain frequencies or vibrations affect plant health or growth rates, making it a more valid scientific inquiry.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
The most important step in a scientific investigation is formulating a clear and testable hypothesis. This hypothesis guides the research process, directing the methodology and experimental design. A well-defined hypothesis allows for systematic observation and data collection, ultimately leading to valid conclusions. Without this foundational step, the investigation may lack focus and direction.
Its ability to generate reliable and valid results, adhere to ethical standards, and be subject to peer review and replication by other researchers.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through research and experimentation. It serves as the basis for scientific investigation to determine if the proposed explanation is valid.