No; it is not testable.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Statistically the results will not be scientifically valid if the sample size is too small.
The average person forms theories with little if any intellectual rigor or scientific investigation, hence, those theories are often not valid.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.
Saying a scientific question must be supportable means it must be answerable through evidence-based methods and data. It implies that the question should be structured in a way that allows for investigation and testing to reach a valid conclusion.
Because good observations ensure accurate data and valid conclusions.
Bias in a scientific investigation usually comes in the form of wanting a particular result. This can skew with the process, doing things that an objective experiment would never do, such as only choose certain results as valid.
Statistically the results will not be scientifically valid if the sample size is too small.
The average person forms theories with little if any intellectual rigor or scientific investigation, hence, those theories are often not valid.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
Its ability to generate reliable and valid results, adhere to ethical standards, and be subject to peer review and replication by other researchers.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through research and experimentation. It serves as the basis for scientific investigation to determine if the proposed explanation is valid.
falsifiability. This principle suggests that for a scientific claim to be valid, it must be testable and potentially refutable through evidence and observation. By being able to be disproven, scientific claims can be rigorously tested and evaluated for accuracy.
Ghost hunting, ghost investigation, paranormal investigation are all valid terms.
The scientific method is essential in a crime scene investigation because it provides a systematic approach to collecting and analyzing evidence. By formulating hypotheses, conducting experiments, and drawing conclusions based on empirical data, investigators can minimize bias and ensure that findings are reliable and valid. This methodical process helps establish a clear chain of evidence, which is crucial for legal proceedings. Ultimately, using the scientific method enhances the accuracy and credibility of the investigation.