No.
Scientifically base beliefs are proven facts, while superstitions are stories that for example if you wear a red socks you will score more runs in cricket or more goals in football. This are passed on stories with np proof at all it can help you.
That most are left handed-
Scientifically speaking, theories do not become facts. Facts are things that are observed to be true; theories are created to explain why a particular set of facts are true.
Scientific facts are based on evidence, beliefs are not
examples of facts and opinions.
Scientifically base beliefs are proven facts, while superstitions are stories that for example if you wear a red socks you will score more runs in cricket or more goals in football. This are passed on stories with np proof at all it can help you.
scientific facts/evidence superstitions about comets and astroids
There are no advantages to superstitions. They are not based on rational facts or science and come to us from a time when there was no science to explain the world. It is fun to do some of them, but other than that they have no value.
Examples of misrepresentation of facts Examples of misrepresentation of facts
Objective truth refers to facts or information that are true regardless of personal beliefs or opinions. Examples of objective truth include scientific laws, mathematical principles, historical events, and universally accepted facts such as the Earth revolving around the sun.
That most are left handed-
scientific understanding of comets,asteroids,and meteor
scientifically named Dianthus carophyllus and was a favorite of William McKinley.
Scientifically speaking, theories do not become facts. Facts are things that are observed to be true; theories are created to explain why a particular set of facts are true.
If they are the facts then the personal beliefs of the giver of the facts are neither here nor there.
Objective truths are facts that are true regardless of personal beliefs or opinions. Examples include: "Water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius," "The Earth orbits the Sun," and "Humans require oxygen to survive."
All reasoning depends at least in part on beliefs. What we accept as a "fact" is a matter of belief. Most people accept things as facts because the people around them believe the same things. Many of these "facts" can be readily disproved scientifically, but are still accepted as fact because there is a social, political or economic pressure to do so.The science of logic accepts this and thus examines not the factual nature of the basis of the reasoning but the coherence of the thought process which leads from the alleged facts to the conclusion.