It is 9.006*10^4.
Explain why 62.605 x106 is not the correct scientific notation. What is the correct way of expressing this scientific notation. Your answer:
It is: 3.0*10^9 msIt is: 3.0^9 ms in scientific notation
No. There has to an exponent on the 10, anywhere from 0 to infinity. A correct example of scientific notation would be 6.022 x 1023, which is Avogadro's number, or 3.0 x 108m/s, which is the speed of light in a vacuum. The correct format for scientific notation is one nonzero digit in front of the decimal point times ten raised to some power.
If we wrote 23.6 million in scientific notation we have 2.36 x 107 for the answer. In scientific notation, there is only one non-zero figure to the left of the decimal, and the other significant figures appear to the decimal's right. We then write an appropriate power of ten to finish our conversion. Out 23.6 million is 23.6 x 106, but we need to shift the decimal one place to the left. That means we'll have to add a power of ten to get the correct conversion, hence 2.36 x 107 will be the correct answer.
The base number must be 10.
Explain why 62.605 x106 is not the correct scientific notation. What is the correct way of expressing this scientific notation. Your answer:
The correct scientific notation for 0.00050210 is: 5.021 × 10-4
The correct scientific notation for 0.00566 is: 5.66 × 10-3
The correct scientific notation for 0.000681 is: 6.81 × 10-4
The correct scientific notation representation for 0.000214 is: 2.14 x 10-4
5.37 x 10-4The correct scientific notation of 0.000537 is: 5.37e-4
It is: 1.55*10^9 in scientific notation
500.0 in Scientific Notation = 5 x 102
411,000 in Scientific Notation = 4.11 x 105
0.00670m in Scientific Notation = 6.7 x 10-3m
1,002,000,000 in Scientific Notation = 1.002 x 109
It is not. "Scientific notation" uses a base of 10. The correct notation would be 1.251 x 10^8