0
What else can I help you with?
Should scientific explanations be logical and testable?
Answer it for me.
What are the qualifications for a scientific explanation to be testable?
Scientific explanations are testable if confidence in the explanation could be undermined by a failure to observe the predicted outcome. One should be able to imagine outcomes that would disprove the explanation.
What does Explanation mean in science mean in science?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Why is science is limited?
Science is limited by its reliance on direct observation and testable hypotheses. Due to this fact, science cannot make judgments about values, ethics, or morality. "Science can reveal how the world is, but not how it should be." (Castro & Huber, 2010)
Do you know anything about science?
The starting point for most science is simple observation, and attempting to find a logical reason for it. Consider Newton and his apple, or Archimedes and his bath. Folk such as de Bono tell us that before you analyse a problem completely, you should try and find five possible solutions or explanations. Then compare and contrast them and proceed to your analysis. Why do rivers flow downhill. Why are the clouds (mostly) well above the Earth. Why do we have a Moon.
Should scientific explanations be logical and testable?
Answer it for me.
What are the qualifications for a scientific explanation to be testable?
Scientific explanations are testable if confidence in the explanation could be undermined by a failure to observe the predicted outcome. One should be able to imagine outcomes that would disprove the explanation.
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes, in the field of science, the overall consensus is that claims and theories should be backed by empirical evidence and logical reasoning. When scientists present arguments supported by data and experimentation, it enhances the credibility and validity of their findings in the scientific community.
Is a theory a hypothesis that hasn't been proven true?
The question is stated incorrectly. It should ask: "Is theory a hypothesis that HAS been proven true?" (my emphasis) 1) A hypothesis in science is merely a conjecture put forth to provide a basis for further debate and to conceive research and experiments. It is a working guess, not an untested theory. 2) A theory is a comprehensive set of explanations for known phenomena. It must make testable predictions that can be confirmed or reputed. 3) When you make explanations without testable predictions, it is called philosophy. To sneer "That is just a theory" is to misunderstand just how much effort goes into producing a testable theory. ## So the answer is No.
What is Scientific explanations?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
What Scientific explanation?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
What are attributes of a good hypothesis?
A good hypothesis is specific, testable, and falsifiable, meaning it can be proven true or false through observation or experimentation. It should also be based on existing knowledge or evidence, and provide a clear direction for further investigation. Additionally, a good hypothesis should be logical and relevant to the research question being addressed.
What is the principles of science?
The principles of science involve using empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and systematic observation to develop theories and explanations for natural phenomena. These principles also emphasize objectivity, reproducibility, and skepticism in order to ensure the reliability and credibility of scientific findings. Additionally, the principles of science suggest that theories should be constantly tested, revised, and refined based on new evidence and observations.
Do science requires the hypothesis be testable and falsifiable and that observation be repeatable?
Yes, scientific hypotheses should be testable and falsifiable, meaning they can be supported or refuted through experimentation and evidence. Observations should also be repeatable by other researchers to ensure the reliability of the results and conclusions drawn from the scientific study.
What should you title your science experiment your testable question which heats up fastest pinewood aluminum or ceramic tile?
Analysis of heat transfer in basic building materials
What does Explanation mean in science mean in science?
Explanations must be Consistent. The explanation for one set of phenomena cannot contradict the explanation for other sets of phenomena. If explanations are inconsistent, they must be rectified or abandoned. Explanations must be Testable. Explanations must be examined in laboratories, in nature, in the field or through the study of past events and must be capable of shown to be incorrect. If they are incorrect they must be changed or abandoned. Preferred Explanations should be Elegant (Simple). Explanations that require the invention of the fewest "missing pieces" have the greatest reliability. Explanations cannot include pieces that are either inconsistent with what is already known or that are untestable.
Why is science is limited?
Science is limited by its reliance on direct observation and testable hypotheses. Due to this fact, science cannot make judgments about values, ethics, or morality. "Science can reveal how the world is, but not how it should be." (Castro & Huber, 2010)
