0
The media makes a positive contribution to the publics perception of science or not?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The media does not make positive contribution to public science. The only positive contribution to science is the Nova channel, Discovery channel, PBS, and science educational programs. The media does not talk about science because news caste anchors are not scientists. And scientists are not new caste anchors. Do not confuse the two as being the same art. News caste anchors only regurgitate news with no aspirations of science and it's wonderful discoveries. On the flip side of this topic, when discoveries are made they do talk about them very briefly because discoveries take time to be discovered.
Maybe you should be a news caste anchor scientists. That way you could be passionate about discoveries
A2. The above material is very true, but the answer is in the hands of the scientists. In my local newspaper, there would be less than 1/4 page of science information from contributors each week. Compared with a couple of pages of arts, a dozen pages of sports, 4 pages of horse racing, and so on.
From personal experience I know that the editors will do their best to publish any material they receive. The fault lies with the science folk failing to contribute.
Scientists are ill educated in methods of communication, particularly those of the 'media'.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was aryabhatta contribution to science?
he told that science is science and sciance cannot be science if sceince if science is not science and if science did not come from science the science will not be science
What was Lord Rutherford contribution to Science Department?
published his atomic theory describing the atom as having a central positive nucleus surrounded by negative orbiting electrons. or so my book says...
Which was Ventor contribution to science?
invented a synthetic cell
What is contribution in science?
A contribution is the act of giving something in order to help achieve or bring about some result.
What was Patricia Bath contribution to science?
i think to workhard on hewr inventions.
Who was a German person who has made a positive contribution to society?
Albert Einstein is a German who contributed to many advancements in science.
What is the contributions of science?
the contribution of science
Roberto del rosario contribution in science?
Robert del rosario contribution in science?
Contribution of science in western science?
Pluto
Was Charles Darwin's contribution negative or positive?
A:To the extent that Charles Darwin helped us understand the mechanism for the evolution of species, his contribution was undoubtedly positive. The reaction of some conservative religious people to his Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection was a negative contribution that, for some people, has held back the understanding of science by a hundred years.
Who is Charles Darwin and was his contribution to science?
Charles Darwin was a naturalist. His major contribution to science was the Theory of Evolution.
What was patricia bath's most important contribution?
her best contribution was science
What was aryabhatta contribution to science?
he told that science is science and sciance cannot be science if sceince if science is not science and if science did not come from science the science will not be science
What contribution in science and how invented or discovered it?
it is discovered
What is contribution of chemistry to other science?
ambot!..
Contribution Aristotle has given to physical science?
what are the contributions of Aristotle to physical science
What was Lord Rutherford contribution to Science Department?
published his atomic theory describing the atom as having a central positive nucleus surrounded by negative orbiting electrons. or so my book says...
